|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, January 11, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Science & Tech
| Previous
| Next
Artificial intelligence is not dead - just recycled!
Finally 32 years after Stanley Kubrick filmed the seminal `Space
Odyssey' based on Arthur Clarke's prophetic vision of a world
taken over by computers, we are in 2001. So why is no one
worried? Anand Parthasarathy examines how classical Artificial
Intelligence is having to swiftly reinvent itself in an
increasingly commercial environment
MANY OF his writings foretold future technological developments
with stunning accuracy. In a 1945 article in the magazine
``Wireless World'', he foresaw geostationary communication
satellites - and by the mid 1960s, they were up and working. In
similar unerring fashion he predicted mobile phones, men landing
on the moon - and inhabited space stations. In the final stunning
moments of ``2001: A Space Odyssey'', the film that Kubrick made
in 1968 based on a short story by Arthur Clarke, the computer,
HAL, takes over the space ship - and kills off the human crew.
We are three weeks into 2001 - and while it can be said that many
of us are the willing slaves of our PCs, we do not log on nightly
in fear of our lives. So is this the only major prediction
implied by Arthur Clarke that is just a bit out of sync with the
timeline? And if so why?
In the last days of 2000, Clarke now 83, and a long term resident
of Colombo, Sri Lanka, maintained in an interview with the
Associated Press that his vision of intelligent machines may not
be all that far-out. ``When someone says that something is
possible - he is almost certainly right. When he states that it
is impossible, he is very probably wrong'' - is Clarke's dictum.
If machines which can match humans in intelligence are not yet in
even a tentative state of achievement, the reasons could be the
changing fortunes of - and the lack of clarity - of the
Artificial Intelligence business. Remember the Japanese Fifth
Generation Project, The Alvey Project in UK, the American thrust
into AI led by the Bhishmacharya of AI, EA Feigenbaum - all part
of the exciting 1980s? Where are they today? For that matter what
about the natural language processing and voice recognition
research spearheaded for decades at IIT Madras and TIFR? On a
warm March morning 14 years ago in the lobby of what was then the
Adyar Gate Hotel in Chennai, I was interviewing a bubbly roly
poly of a man - Dr. Douglas Lenat - head of a consortium of US
high tech companies called Microelectronics and Computer
Technology Corporation (MCC). He had just emerged from the
conference hall where he was a key speaker at an International
Conference on Fifth Generation Computing. ``We aim to put the
world's common sense on the computer!'' Lenat, a man not given to
understatement, told me. In my writeup the following Sunday in
``The Hindu's'' ``Meet...'' column, I could not quite curtail my
own enthusiasm at the Lenat vision. Intermittently, since then I
have been monitoring the project on the MCC website - but nothing
practical ever came of it. When I checked recently, Lenat was no
more with MCC. Last week The New York Times was quoting Lenat,
bashing the current breed of speech recognition softwares which
required you to spell out punctuation. Today Lenat has moved on
from trying to put all knowledge into one data base - and heads a
Texas company called Cycorp.
Among the first people to realise that governments and financiers
will not wait with breathless anticipation for decades to see the
fruits of high sounding research like AI, were the scientists at
MIT's AI Lab and at Carnegie Mellon's Robotics Lab - both in the
US. Today they virtually set the agenda of what AI should be
tackling. The mantra seems to be: take up tasks that will capture
the paying public's imagination - and don't worry if people
snigger: they are not the ones bankrolling the research.
The one's who are - include shrewd Japanese companies like Sony
and Honda, who are laughing all the way to the back these days,
raking in the yen that flow from millions of customers for their
canny robots. The second improved version of Sony's robo-pup,
``Aibo'' was launched on January 2. The metallic puppy has 18
joints producing 250 movements. It crouches, plays ball, snuggles
if fondled and sulks if slapped.Aibo which means ``partner'' in
Japanese was an instant sensation with Japanese kids at first
launch in June 1999 inspite of the stiff price ( the equivalent
of Rs 60,000).Meanwhile car maker Honda, recently unveiled
``Asimo'', (Advanced Step in Innovative Mobility), a 120 cms tall
human like robot. It can be a help in the house, opening doors,
setting tables, loading the washing machine and cutting
vegetables.
Not to be left out of the good thing, leading American hand held
computer maker, Palm Inc, has last week licensed a company,
Acroname, to sell a kit which will turn their Palm Pilots into
the brains of six sided, three wheeled robot. The device
developed at Carnegie Mellon is a quantum jump in the technology
of robotics - for the first time a mass consumer computer can be
modified to become the physical robot.``The last 10 years of the
20th century were dominated by the PC. In the first ten years of
the 21st century, robots with independent movement will
dominate'', says Sony's Vice President Toshitada Doi.
Dr. Rodney Brooks of MIT AI Labs is also Chairman of iRobot - a
robotics company that makes robots for private missions to Mars.
But for the butter on its bread, it also makes ``My Real Baby'',
a $ 100, doll marketed by Hasbro, which smiles, cries, coos - and
draws attention to a wet nappy.
So that's AI today - albeit less conspicuous. Remember the Paper
Clip wizard in Microsoft's Word 2000? The fuzzy washing machine
that selects wash cycles after feeling the clothes? It's AI at
work.
And as for that old bogey about a machine overtaking Man - Rahul
Sarpheshkar, an Indian researcher at MIT wrote in a recent paper
in ``Nature'': ``We are not going to get close to the human brain
in the next 50 or 100 years'' He admits that even the most
sophisticated neural computer cannot do what a weeks-old baby
does: walk across the room without tripping over obstacles. Get
back into the pages of fiction, HAL, you still belong there.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Science & Tech Previous : Web site download manager Next : Towards third generation wireless technology | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|