|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, January 11, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
HC directive to Swamy
By Our Special Correspondent
CHENNAI, JAN. 10. The Madras High Court has directed the Janata
Party president, Dr. Subramanian Swamy and its Tamil Nadu unit
chief, Ms. Chandralekha to submit their averments in an affidavit
to the Sub Collector, Tindivanam, in connection with a case in
1993, when Dr. Swamy's security man fired in the air to scare a
crowd.
Mr. Justice P. Sathasivam gave the direction, while disposing of
writ petitions filed by Dr. Swamy and Ms. Chandralekha, seeking
to quash the sub-collector's summons for appearance for an
enquiry regarding the firing incident.
In their petitions, the two said Dr. Swamy was undertaking a
`Tamilaga Nallatchi Iyakkam'' campaign in 1993, against the then
AIADMK regime ``to bring to the notice of the public the misdeeds
and maladministration of the (then) Chief Minister of Tamil
Nadu''.On June 14, 1993, he arranged a road-side meeting at
Tindivanam. To thwart the meeting, the AIADMK volunteers hurled
stones on his car. Sensing an imminent danger to their life, Dr.
Swamy's special security personnel fired in the air to scare the
crowd. The two leaders escaped and reached Chennai.
Later, the Tindivanam sub-collector issued a memo asking them to
appear before him on November 21, 1994 for an inquiry under the
Police Standing Orders. Immediately, they wrote back requesting
the officer to hold the inquiry at Chennai, in view of security
problems. As it was not considered and a second summons issued,
the two filed petitions to quash the proceedings.
Mr. Justice Sathasivam said the petitioners' only grievance was
that it would be difficult for them to appear in person in
Tindivanam. Hence, they could be permitted to submit their case
in an affidavit to the Sub-Collector, who could pass orders in
accordance with law. It was open to the party leaders to raise
all objections including legal objections regarding
maintainability of the sub-collector's proceedings, he added.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Ponmudi refutes Jayalalitha's claims Next : 'Govt. will consider Film Chamber demands' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|