|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, January 05, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
Qureshi back in Tihar Jail
NEW DELHI, JAN 4. The Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF)
leader, Hashim Qureshi, lodged in judicial custody for the 1971
hijacking of an Indian Airlines plane, was today sent back to
Tihar Jail from the Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital following an
improvement in his condition.
- UNI
HC seeks AG opinion on Qureshi trial
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, JAN. 4. In a new turn to the case of Mr. Mohammed
Hashim Qureshi, a founder- member of the Jammu and Kashmir
Liberation Front, the Delhi High Court today said it would like
to hear the Attorney-General of India on whether Mr. Qureshi
could be tried in India for hijacking an Indian Airlines plane in
1971 despite the fact that he had been tried and convicted in the
case earlier by a Pakistani court.
The Jammu and Kashmir Government wants to prosecute Mr. Qureshi
for kidnapping and robbery under the Ranbir Penal Code as well as
working for Pakistani intelligence under the Enemy Agents
Ordinance, 1948.
The contention of counsel for Mr. Qureshi is that his client
enjoys the benefit of the bar on a second trial under Article
20(2) of the Indian Constitution as he has been convicted once in
the case by a Pakistani court.
When arguments on the issue resumed before the court on Thursday,
a Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Cyriac Joseph and Mr.
Justice S.N. Kapoor told Mr. Maninder Singh, Standing Counsel for
the Union Government, that the case seemed to be an unprecedented
one involving national interests and having international
ramifications on which the court wanted the Attorney-General to
assist.
``In view of the importance and ramifications of the case, the
court wanted to be assisted by the Attorney-General,'' the Bench
said in its order.
It requested Mr. Singh to convey the view of the court to the
Attorney-General and request him to fix a suitable date for
enlightening the court on the matter in the next week.
Later, Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, appearing for Mr. Qureshi, said that his
client was entitled to the Constitutional benefit of the
prohibition on a second trial for the same offence.
Quoting a Supreme Court judgment, Mr. Tulsi submitted that an
accused could not be tried separately for the offences which
arose from the same facts, incident and transaction.
The offences - illegal confinement, kidnapping, robbery and
working for the Indian intelligence - for which Mr. Qureshi was
charged had arisen from the facts and incident, that of
hijacking, and involved the similar transaction. He further said
that various international covenants, including the International
Convention on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention for
Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft, to which India is a
signatory, favoured his client and the court would have to take
them into consideration while deciding the matter.
Mr. Qureshi is in judicial custody in the case on a Delhi court
order. He was on Wednesday shifted to an intensive care unit of
the Deen Dayal Upadhaya Hospital here after he complained of
chest pain.
Mr. Qureshi surrendered before the Immigration authorities at the
Indira Gandhi International Airport here on December 29.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Laxman ousts Jain from party post | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|