|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, December 11, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Speaker's meeting will be crucial
By Neena Vyas
NEW DELHI, DEC. 10. The Congress is insisting on a discussion in
Parliament under a substantive motion on their demand for the
resignations of three Cabinet Ministers charged with conspiring
to demolish the Babri Masjid on December 2, 1992. But, should the
Opposition parties decide to change their tactics at a meeting
tomorrow, before all party leaders meet in the Speaker's chamber,
they may find that the admissibility Rule 186, Clause VIII, could
stump them.
The Rule clearly states that a discussion ``shall not relate to
any matter which is under adjudication by a court of law having
jurisdiction in any part of India,'' and the Babri demolition
case is certainly in court. The fear in the Opposition camp is
that the Speaker will not be able to rule in their favour if the
Congress insists on discussing the resignations.
A way out for the Opposition would be to change the tactics and
discuss the Prime Minister's controversial statements on Ayodhya;
but a consensus on that would have to await the Opposition's
strategy meeting.
The Speaker has called a meeting of all party leaders at 10 a.m.
to arrive at a decision which would allow Parliament to function
normally after a week of adjournments.
Whatever form the discussion takes, the Prime Minister, Mr. A.B.
Vajpayee, has been forced by his allies at the NDA meeting today
to agree to take a strongly secular stand on the Ayodhya issue in
Parliament. Even so, it is certain that Opposition parties, and
perhaps even the allies, will query him hard on his controversial
statements made earlier this week.
Mr. Pramod Mahajan, Minister for Parliamentary Affairs, made it
clear that the Government will be willing to accept whatever
decision the presiding officers in the two Houses take. The
Government stand is that it will be up to the Opposition to
convince the presiding officers to accept their motions, and
clearly the Government is depending on the Opposition not being
able to find the appropriate rules to discuss the demand for the
Ministers' resignations.
The Congress spokesperson, Mr. Anil Shastri, reiterated that his
party will not budge from its demand for a discussion on the
resignations of the three Ministers.
The ruling parties are also likely to exploit the antipathy
between the Congress and the Samajwadi Party which is loathe to
allow the Congress the lead role on the Ayodhya issue as it
blames the Narasimha Rao and the Rajiv Gandhi Governments as much
as the BJP for what happened on December 6, 1992.
The Left has been trying to smoothen things out so that the
Opposition does not present a divided house tomorrow. It also
seems that the Congress may be reluctant to discuss the larger
Ayodhya issue as the heat would also be on it - after all, the
unlocking of the disputed structure for `pooja' and the
`shilanyas' (laying of foundation stone) in Ayodhya took place
under Congress regimes. This is a major reason for disagreements
within the Opposition.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Ram temple: RSS offers help to VHP Next : 'Solidarity with Vajpayee' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|