|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, December 08, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
'Person adopting child has right to dispose of property'
NEW DELHI, DEC. 7. The Supreme Court has ruled that a person
adopting a child has a right to dispose of his property except
when he is bound by an agreement that the adopted son would
inherit his property.
A Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice M. Jagannadha Rao and Mr.
Justice M.B. Shah said ``adoption does not deprive the adoptive
father or the mother of the power to dispose of his or her
property by transfer or by will. This power to dispose of the
property would be subject to any agreement between the parties,''
the Bench said.
The issue came up in an appeal by legal representatives of the
late Chiranjilal Srilal Goenka against decision of an arbitrator,
who had decided that the adoptive father or mother was prohibited
from disposing of a property as the adopted son was to inherit it
due to an agreement.
Goenka died in November 1985 during pendency of an appeal filed
by him against a Delhi High Court order in a matter relating to
confiscation of gold by Customs authorities and then on a common
consent, an arbitrator was appointed by the disputing parties to
decide who would be the legal heir.
Goenka, who adopted one of his grandsons Radheshyam, had later
made a will in favour of his daughter Sushila Bai, whom the Court
ultimately held to be the legal heir. The arbitrator had said
that prior to adoption of Radheshyam, there was an oral agreement
between his father, Mangalchand Kedia and Goenka and, therefore,
the will in favour of a daughter was inoperative. He had said
that after the oral agreement, Kedia had written a letter to
Goenka saying that he was giving his son for adoption and his son
would inherit the entire movable and immovable property after the
death of Goenkas.
But the Apex Court said that this letter never restricted the
power of the adoptive father as this was merely an offer letter
and not registered. Besides, it could not also be considered as
an agreement in the absence of consent from Goenkas.
- PTI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Water a fundamental right: apex court Next : Bail refused to ex-Minister's son in Jessica murder case | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|