Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Friday, December 08, 2000

Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Entertainment | Miscellaneous | Features | Classifieds | Employment | Index | Home

National | Previous | Next

'Person adopting child has right to dispose of property'

NEW DELHI, DEC. 7. The Supreme Court has ruled that a person adopting a child has a right to dispose of his property except when he is bound by an agreement that the adopted son would inherit his property.

A Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice M. Jagannadha Rao and Mr. Justice M.B. Shah said ``adoption does not deprive the adoptive father or the mother of the power to dispose of his or her property by transfer or by will. This power to dispose of the property would be subject to any agreement between the parties,'' the Bench said.

The issue came up in an appeal by legal representatives of the late Chiranjilal Srilal Goenka against decision of an arbitrator, who had decided that the adoptive father or mother was prohibited from disposing of a property as the adopted son was to inherit it due to an agreement.

Goenka died in November 1985 during pendency of an appeal filed by him against a Delhi High Court order in a matter relating to confiscation of gold by Customs authorities and then on a common consent, an arbitrator was appointed by the disputing parties to decide who would be the legal heir.

Goenka, who adopted one of his grandsons Radheshyam, had later made a will in favour of his daughter Sushila Bai, whom the Court ultimately held to be the legal heir. The arbitrator had said that prior to adoption of Radheshyam, there was an oral agreement between his father, Mangalchand Kedia and Goenka and, therefore, the will in favour of a daughter was inoperative. He had said that after the oral agreement, Kedia had written a letter to Goenka saying that he was giving his son for adoption and his son would inherit the entire movable and immovable property after the death of Goenkas.

But the Apex Court said that this letter never restricted the power of the adoptive father as this was merely an offer letter and not registered. Besides, it could not also be considered as an agreement in the absence of consent from Goenkas.

- PTI

Send this article to Friends by E-Mail


Section  : National
Previous : Water a fundamental right: apex court
Next     : Bail refused to ex-Minister's son in Jessica
           murder case

Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Entertainment | Miscellaneous | Features | Classifieds | Employment | Index | Home

Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu

Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu