|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, December 05, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Military approach
Sir, - This refers to the article ``Security and governance I and
II'' (The Hindu, Nov. 20 and 21).
The author is absolutely right when he presents the case of
political decay, ineffective governance, acquiescence to criminal
pressures and criminal-political nexus posing grave threats to
national security. But the view of the author that inadequacy of
military approach to national security has become evident the
world over, the implication that India could adopt a similar
shift in policy and that South Asian countries including India
tend to exaggerate external threats to divert attention from
internal issues merits discussion.
First, the implications of discarding a military approach to
national security must essentially be viewed in the peculiar
situation India and Pakistan find themselves, rather than viewing
it in the context as emerging the world over in the new world
order and a unipolar environment. The peculiar India-Pak equation
has been aptly summed up by Barry Buzan in his book People,
States and Fear. He states that ``India and Pakistan offer a
particularly tragic case of structural political threat, wherein
India and Pakistan cannot afford to ignore each other because of
their historical, geographical and cultural ties but their
organising principles pose a `permanent' threat to each other.''
He argues and rightly so, that Pakistan, organised on the
principle of Islamic unity, fears absorption by India whereas
India envisages the breakdown of the Indian Union into a number
of single successor states, instigated by Pakistan. It is in this
context that the implications of discarding a military approach
to national security must be viewed.
Secondly, the threat to India from Pakistan in J&K and anti-
national elements in the Northeast is by no means facile. Recent
developments, post-Kargil and hostile India bashing by Pakistan
bears testimony to this. Therefore media attention on these
problems of external threat are not by any means an attempt by
the political hierarchy to divert attention from internal issues.
The fact that all internal problems enumerated by the erudite
author also exist only adds to India's cup of woes.
Thirdly, failure to provide human security, humane governance and
violation of human rights are, in essence, different problems in
border States facing external threat (J&K and the Northeast) and
interior States like U.P. and Bihar where the causes are totally
different. Effective governance in border States can come about
only when fissiparous elements engaged in destabilising peace are
neutralised. This can be achieved only by a military approach, as
threat to these States emanates from without.
S. V. Sundar,
Chennai
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Indian State under siege Next : Just and liberal | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|