|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, October 15, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Prison and punishment
THE effort to bring about reforms in prisons is probably as old
as crime and punishment. This compendium of articles and write-
ups by experts fulfils a long-felt vacuum on the subject of
punishment of criminals and the related issue of prison life.
The former Chief Justice of India, M. N. Venkatachaliah, has
rightly pointed out in his foreword that "in India, penal
sanctions were based on the avowed philosophy that the efficacy
of punishment is in proportion to the severity of the feeling of
terror it produces for the 'repressive' in place of the
'restitutive path'." The compilation, however, does not answer
this question directly or fully. The reason is that since 1947,
our administrators, politicians and thinkers have had little time
for finding the time and energy to address themselves to this
question, beyond establishing a Law Commission on the pattern of
those in the developed countries.
As a result, the state of affairs has not progressed much beyond
those obtained in Lord Macaulay's "Report of the Indian Law
Commission on the Penal Code" submitted to Lord Auckland on
October 14, 1837. The most likeable, informative and properly
analysed article in the book is by Rajeev Dhawan, wherein he has
taken pains to discuss the mentality, outlook and motive of the
Macaulay Law Commission in proper perspective, giving valuable
and impressive quotations from Macaulay's Report.
The Macaulay Law Commission, in an insulting manner, sidetracked
the Hindu and the Mohammedan systems of law, classifying them as
"foreign", and added that they "were introduced by conquerors
differing in race, manners, language, and religion from the great
mass of the people". That Law Commission further commented that
the criminal law of the "Hindoos was long ago superseded by that
of the Mohammedans".
That Law Commission did not want to exempt Indian Maharajahs and
zamindars from the operation of the British Indian Criminal Law,
but exempted their white brethren because it was
"desirable...that our national character should stand high in the
estimation of the inhabitants of India." Rajeev Dhawan has
correctly remarked that India's criminal justice has "remained
the same whilst the criminal law has become more wide-ranging,
harsher, and with lesser procedural safeguards and heavier
sentences".
To understand what it means for the common man (leaving aside the
big businessmen who can wake up the Chief Justice of India at
midnight and get bail for an offence under FERA, or a cinema
owner who can manage to get a judge transferred so that the new
judge can demand a fresh examination of the witnesses), the
reader has to go straight to the narrative by Pushpa Kapila
Hingorani under the title, "The Problems of the Undertrials".
This social worker/lawyer, practising at the Supreme Court of
India has portrayed in detail the sufferings of undertrials from
Hussainara Khatoon to Gulkanrai and Ramswarup Sahni. She also
moved a Public Interest Petition in the Supreme Court which was
then classed as a habeas corpus petition on January 11, 1979 and
the bench of Justice V. D. Tulzapurkar and Justice R. S. Pathak
issued notice to the State of Bihar. The subsequent developments
are history.
Kadra Pahadiya and three other kids between the age of 9 and 11
years were rotting in Bihar jails for years in Santhal Parganas
since 1972 without even the Sessions Court taking up their case
for hearing until 1980 when, again a social worker, Vasudha
Dhagamwar wrote a poignant letter to the Supreme Court on
November 28, 1980. This letter was treated as a writ petition by
Justice (later Chief Justice of India) P. N. Bhagwati and for
subsequent developments, the readers are referred to a write-up
in the book by Mukul Mudgal. Even the Supreme Court had to remark
that the shocking state of affairs in that State constitute "an
affront to the dignity of man and it is surprising, indeed
shocking, to the conscience of mankind that such a situation
should prevail in any civilised society".
It should not be surprising that the write-ups by the women
authors in this collection - be it the introduction to the
subject and the conclusions by Rani Shankardass or the
descriptive details of the largest jail in our country, the Tihar
Jail in Delhi by Sarita Sarangi - are real eye openers for the
Indian society.
Two very important points dealt with by Justice V. R. Krishna
Iyer deserve special consideration. The first is custodial
justice about which he suggests that the country "must have a
National Authority on Custodial Justice to Women (NACJW) with
powers and responsibilities, with infrastructure - horizontal and
vertical - whose paramount duty is to check...dysfunctional,
and...suggest new models for functional betterment". Secondly, he
remarks that it is an unfortunate notion that "criminal
'lunatics' are more criminal and less 'lunatic', and therefore in
the mind of the law-maker, deserve to be jailed rather than
treated".
One of the more useful suggestions in this compilation is in the
write-up by Vivien Stern titled "Alternatives to Prisons:
Reflections and Experiences" based on experiments in Zimbabwe,
under the Community Service Scheme. Quoting from Article 10 of
the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Stern
notes, "those deprived of their liberty shall be treated with
humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human
person (p. 420)." Because of its initial success, the Zimbabwe
Community Service Scheme has been included as a major and
important portion of the article on Non-custodial Punishments by
Paddinton Garwe and Andrew Msengezi as an experiment that should
be emulated by other countries.
Though Rani Shankardass has not considered it possible within her
treatise, which is solely about the modern times, it would have
been useful to her compilation if she had included an article on
punishment and prison system, as well as community service as a
mode of punishment in ancient India. However, she has done a
unique and pioneering service by her compilation on punishment
and prison, and it would be a very useful exercise if the Union
Government's Law Ministry gets the articles by Rod Morgan, Henry
Brooke, Vivien Stern, Rajeev Dhawan and the compiler's own
article "Women, Crime and Jail Justice", as also her conclusions,
printed in a small booklet form and distributed it free to
everyone in the judiciary.
K. B. PARSAI
Punishment and the Prison, Edited by Rani Shankardass, Sage
Publications India Private Limited, New Delhi; Thousand Oaks,
London. Rs. 550.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Watered-down tale Next : Imagination run riot | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|