|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, October 15, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Pranab to Rao's defence
By Harish Khare
NEW DELHI, OCT. 14. Senior Congress(I) leader, Mr. Pranab
Mukherjee, has asserted that it is wrong to suggest that the
party has distanced itself from Mr. P.V. Narasimha Rao in his
hour of legal adversity. Arguing that stray, and perhaps poorly
formulated, comments from junior spokespersons could create the
impression that the party was ditching its former president, Mr.
Mukherjee notes that it is difficult for a responsible political
party like the Congress(I) to openly criticise a judicial verdict
(as opposed to the executive order, for example, under which the
Janata Party Government sought to detain Mrs. Indira Gandhi).
As someone who held senior positions in the party and government
before, during and after the ``P.V.'' era, Mr. Mukherjee speaks
with restraint and responsibility.
He points out that the party's position has to be understood in
the light of the AICC(I) reaction on September 29 when Special
Judge, Mr. Ajit Bharihoke, first pronounced the verdict on Mr.
Rao.
The senior CWC member recalls that the party had suggested that
it was unable to appreciate ``the logic of judgment'', and that
it had hoped that Mr. Rao would get relief at the time of appeal
at higher judicial forums.
What is more, Mr. Mukherjee reminds everyone that it was Mr. Rao
who had shown ``exemplary courage and dignity'' when he resigned
as party president in 1996.
Asserting that there was no political compulsion on Mr. Rao's
part to resign, and that barring four members of the Congress
Working Committee (Mr. Sharad Pawar, Mr. Ghulam Nabi Azad, Mr.
Ahmed Patel and Mr. Balram Jakhar), Mr. Rao enjoyed overwhelming
majority in the CWC just as he did in the Congress Parliamentary
Party and the AICC.
But, recalls Mr. Mukherjee, Mr. Rao had argued that he could not
involve the Congress(I) in his problems with the law.
Mr. Mukherjee's formulations appear at variation with the
expression - in private - of glee among a large number of senior
party leaders over Mr. Rao's discomfort. Initial comments from
Mr. Anil Shastri and Mr. Ajit Jogi, two favorite voices of the
10-Janpath establishment, did give the impression that the party
leadership was not going to lose sleep if Mr. Narasimha Rao loses
his freedom.
A section of the Sonia Gandhi partisans has been downright
joyful; it has been happily noted among the Sonia partisans that
after his indictment and conviction, Mr. Rao would hardly be able
to become the rallying point for the dissidents.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : RSS criticises Rajkumar Next : Agree to a 'swadeshi' church, says Sudarshan | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|