|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, October 05, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Apollo Hospitals not absolved fully
By P. Sunderarajan
NEW DELHI, OCT. 4. The much-awaited report of the experts
committee that probed the treatment of late Union Minister,
Rangarajan Kumaramangalam, has said the lack of proper treatment
during the period between his discharge from Apollo Hospitals and
his admission to the All- India Institute of Medical Sciences
(AIIMS) was an important cause of his death. But, at the same
time, the committee has not absolved Apollo fully and nor has it
agreed with the diagnosis of Kumaramangalam's illness at AIIMS.
``Overall, the committee feels that the most significant
contribution towards the outcome in the case of Shri
Kumaramangalam was the fact that the patient did not recieve
appropriate medical advice for over three months following his
discharge from Apollo Hospital, till his final admission at
AIIMS'', says the panel's report, which was officially released
here today by the Union Health Minister, Dr. C.P.Thakur.
But, even while putting much of the blame on the course of
treatment during the intervening period, the panel has not
absolved the doctor at the Apollo Hospital either. Likewise, it
has not agreed with the diagnosis of Kumaramangalam's illness by
doctors at AIIMS.
According to the panel, the doctor at Apollo Hospital could have
consulted a clinical haemotologist and carried out investigations
to evaluate the immuno-haemotological status of Kumarangalam.
This could have helped to arrive at a definite diagnosis. These
further tests were necessary considering the findings of
investigations such as TLC, DLC, raised ESR and FNAC.
The panel in this regard noted that the doctor treating
Kumaramangalam, Dr. P. Rao had also considered evaluation of the
immune status, but this line of investigation was not pursued.
The committee also observed that Dr. Rao should have informed
Kumaramangalam that his blood counts were a ``bit unusual'', and
he should definitely get the tests repeated in two to three weeks
after discharge from Apollo.
On the diagnosis of Kumaramangalam's illness at AIIMS, the
committee said the symptoms - history of irregular fever, weight
loss, episodes of sepsis, leucopenia, focal hypodense lesions in
the spleen (on CT) and atypical lymphocytes in the bone marrow
were consistent with Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, a cancer of lymph
nodes. The AIIMS doctors had, on the other hand, diagnosed it as
a case of acute myeloid leukemia.
On the kind of treatment taken by Kumaramangalam in the
intevening period between his discharge from Apollo Hospital and
his admission to AIIMS, the panel quoted the family members of
the late Union Minister as stating that though no doctor was
consulted officially and no investigation carried out, he was
taking anti-tubercular drugs on the advice of Mrs.
Kumaramangalam's father and a friend-cum-doctor, Dr. Tyagi. ``It
is important to point out that no prescriptions were made
available and neither the dose nor frequency of the drugs
administered could be ascertained'', the panel said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : We were right all along: Apollo Hospital Next : Further probe ruled out | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|