|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, October 03, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Construction of flyover: Clear and present danger
By K.V.S. Madhav
HYDERABAD, OCT. 2. It is a flyover which was heading in no
direction as planners pondered over its landing. And, now it has
suddenly decided to descend on the houses of Gaganmahal
residents.
Standing motionless for nearly two years now in front of the
Secretariat, the "monument of rank bad planning and design" is
back in the news with hapless residents being slapped notices of
land acquisition. Intimidating ones that threaten to demolish the
roof over their heads.
If action follows, about 300-400 people residing along the Lower
Tank Bund road would be affected by the demolition and obviously
they are up in arms. "This flyover is a big mistake," they fume
criticising the Government for frequently changing the flyover
alignment plans.
"We have made umpteen representations to everyone, including the
Chief Minister, Mr. N. Chandrababu Naidu, on the matter but in
vain. We have no other choice but to go to the court," the
residents under the banner of Sri Katta Maisamma Residents
Welfare Association said in unison here on Monday.
Former IIT professor and association president, Mrs. Indira
Mahadevan, says the manner in which the notices were served on a
few residents was intriguing. "Why did the officials do it so
hastily after doing nothing for two full years? This could be a
pre-meditated move taking advantage of the court vacation", she
alleges.
What galls the residents is the changing alignment of the
flyover. "Everytime there's a hue and cry, its alignment has been
changed as in the case of protests against the removal of Dr.
B.R. Ambedkar's statue and a dargah which come in its path,"
fumes association treasurer, Mrs. C. Kalindi.
"Graveyards, dhobi ghats and star hotels will not be touched. It
is only the middle class homes which come in the way because we
have no voice," she says, very agitated. The flyover originally
was to have three arms--one onto upper Tank Bund, another towards
Basheerbagh and a slip ramp behind BRK Bhavan.
If the Government had stuck to the original plan, "our houses
would not have been in jeopardy," points out, Mr. M.R. Rao, a
resident.
Mrs. Mahadevan also has a suggestion of laying the flyover ramp
beyond the temple with 7.5 metre width which according to her
would give "two service roads of six metre width on either side
of the piers. This will also solve the problems of pilgrims
thronging the Katta Maisamma temple every week".
Says Mr. Krishnamurthy, former employee of A.P. Fisheries, who
has a restaurant on the road, "We have invested Rs.10 lakhs and
employed 25 people. What will happen to all that?," he asks. Many
residents plead that the Government should spare their houses if
only because the area has several retired people. "In this ripe
age we should be saved of this ordeal," says one resident.
"The Chief Minister harps on public involvement. But, there was
no public hearing on the flyover plans. Even now we do not know
which way the flyover is heading," a resident frets highlighting
the need for more transparency which the Government keeps talking
about.
Even as the residents wait with bated breath over where the ramp
would finally be landed, the residents had decided to send a
distress signal--SOS. This time it means `Save our Structures'.
The urgency of the plea was bold and clear. That they were in
danger and need help quickly.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Land allotted to Malleswari Next : Website on N.G. Ranga launched | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|