|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 24, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
RSS, VHP, Hindu Aikya Vedi men chargesheeted
By Our Staff Reporter
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, SEPT. 23. The Crime Branch special
investigation team, probing the largescale rioting in the city on
July 13 which resulted in the murder of KSRTC bus conductor
Rajesh and destruction of public as well as private property, has
submitted a detailed chargesheet against 35 RSS, BJP, VHP and
Hindu Aikya Vedi functionaries accusing them of murder, criminal
conspiracy, destruction of property, trespass and unlawful
assembly among other offences.
The special team, headed by Mr. Joshua (Dy.SP-Crime Branch) and
Mr. Ramachandran (Circle Inspector), today filed the chargesheet
before the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II. The public
prosecutor, Mr. Rajagoplan Nair, will lead the prosecution.
The prime accused in the case are the BMS district secretary and
general secretary of NOBW, Gireeshan, and the RSS Saririkh
Pramukh of Kollam and Thiruvananthapuram districts, Padmakumar.
The other accused include the State Organising secretary of the
ABVP, Umakanthan, the former State president of the ABVP,
Jayakumar, the district secretary of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad,
Manikantan, State leader of the Hindu Aikyavedi, Sisupalgi, the
secretary of the RSS Karyalayam, Murali, the RSS Mandalam
Karyavah, Raju, the RSS Bowdhik Sikshak Pramukh, Unnikrishnan,
the RSS Mahakaryavahaks, Raj Kumar and Ravi Kumar and the RSS
Bowdhik Pramukh, Sudhakaran.
The prosecution case is that the RSS, VHP, Hindu Aikyavedi
functionaries had hatched a criminal conspiracy at Samskriti
Bhavan on September 12 night to attack the police and unleash
violence in the city as a tit-for-tat response to the police
action against ABVP workers before the Secretariat the same day
morning.
(Police on September 12 had resorted to use of force to disperse
ABVP workers who tried to barge into the Secretariat through the
police cordon stationed at the front gate. Several workers,
including girls, were injured in the police action.)
The Crime Branch case is that the conspirators contacted
competent workers to carry out their plan and made arrangements
to distribute weapons, including wooden staffs and iron bars,
among the cadres.
According to the chargesheet, around 1,500 RSS, ABVP, Hindu
Aikya Vedi, VHP, BJP workers assembled at East Fort at the behest
of their leaders at around 11 a.m. The workers were armed with
wooden staffs, "dhandas"" in RSS parlance and iron bars. The
agitators then marched towards the Secretariat. The march reached
the Secretariat at around 11.30 a.m. The agitators armed with
staffs and bars tried to force their way into the Secretariat
through the police cordon at the gates.
The executive magistrate who was present at the spot declared
the demonstration an unlawful assembly and asked the agitators to
disperse. When his warning failed to deter the marchers, the
police fired tear-gas shells and resorted to caning to disperse
the protesters.
After sometime, nearly 400 of the 1,500 workers regrouped in
front of the Secretariat. The leaders present there made inciting
speeches and the dharna dispersed after 10 minutes. In his
speech, the second accused, Padmakumar, threatened the police and
the Government with dire consequences. The Crime Branch
chargesheet pointed out that at the order of Padmakumar the
workers split into two groups. One group walked from Statue
towards General Hospital while the other proceeded to East Fort
leaving a trial of destruction in their wake.
The group which moved towards East Fort trespassed into the
Transport Bhavan and damaged nearly 230 KSRTC buses which were
parked there. Inside East Fort, the group damaged nearly 40 brand
new vehicles which were brought there for registration. The
agitators also damaged 81 RTC buses parked inside the main
garage.
The Crime Branch chargesheet stated that the bus conductor,
Rajesh, was killed near the Taluk office when he objected to the
violence. The prosecution case is that the 17th accused Vinod hit
Rajesh on the head with an iron bar. The 19th accused, Poodan
Biju, followed up the first blow with one from a wooden rafter he
was carrying at the time. Rajesh who was admitted to the Medical
College Hospital succumbed to his injuries on September 15.
The other RSS, VHP, ABVP and Hindu Aikyavedi workers who figure
as accused in the case are Ramesh alias Chandramouli, Anand
Mohanan, Praveen Kumar, Vishnu alias Shinu Kumar, Vinod Kumar,
Narayanan alias Krishnakumar, Aji alias Ayyappan Nair, Shibhu
Kumar, Vijayesh, Subash Kumar, Santosh Kumar, Vinod, Sudarshanan,
Poodan Biju alias Vijayakumar, Ani alias Aji Kumar, Kattikattan
alias Santhoshkumar, Madhu alias Vettukathi Madhu, Suresh alias
Mallan Podiyan, Thulasi alias Malayil Kallan Thulasi,
Rajasekharan and Arun Kumar. Police said all except Santhosh
Kumar, Madhu, Umakanthan, Rajkumar and Sisupalji are in judicial
custody.
The Crime Branch had interviewed more than 500 witnesses and
filed the chargesheet within 72 days of the incident. Twenty-six
of the accused were arrested in swift pre-dawn operation last
month.
Most of the accused are in judicial custody after the bail
applications were rejected the by the District as well as High
Court.
Crime branch officials also conducted three identification
parades at the Sub Jail to identify the real culprits. The parade
was conducted in the presence of a magistrate. Some of the
witnesses were threatened during the identification parade by the
accused persons.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : A tell-tale sign of 'explosion' Next : Candidate accused of violating poll code | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|