|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 10, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Suryanelli verdict: hope for rape victims
By K.P.M. Basheer
KOCHI, SEPT. 9. It's light at the end of a long dark tunnel for
the girl from Suryanelli, who was abducted from her school at
Munnar and raped by over 40 men for 42 days at 15 different
places in Kerala and Tamil Nadu, in 1996.
When the special court at Kottayam, set up for the first time in
the country to try the sexual harassment of a minor girl, handed
down stiff punishment to 35 of her tormentors on September 6, it
created judicial history on many counts.
More important, it has given a glimmer of hope for the countless
victims of rape and sexual harassment across the country, who had
so far failed to put their tormentors in the dock.
But more than anything else, the Suryanelli verdict is the
triumphant end to the saga of a village postmaster, a nurse in a
remote tea-garden dispensary and their teen-age daughter. Braving
all odds, they showed the courage to expose the rapists and take
them to court. They were weak and poor; they were harassed and
frequently threatened by the culprits; they were jeered at and
taunted by society. Still, the three fought bravely.
``We are fighting not for our daughter alone,'' the postmaster
had told this reporter in an interview four years ago. ``We are
fighting for the daughters of all the parents who have suffered
the same kind of pain.'' His wife had this resolve: no other
daughter in the country should face such painful experience.
This resolve echoes in the special court's verdict. The special
judge, Mr. M. Sasidharan Nambiar, after 317 days of trial that
started after the special investigation team probed the crime for
two and a half years, sent at one go 32 men and three women, to
jail for involvement in one of the most sensational sex racket
cases in the country in recent times. Of the 35 sentenced, nine
persons, including one woman, got 13 years' rigorous imprisonment
as they were found guilty of rape, mass rape, abduction, illegal
detention and sale of a minor girl for sexual abuse. The Rs. 4.20
lakhs to be collected from the culprits as fine would go to the
girl.
Rarely have women been sentenced for rape and mass rape in India,
but the judge found Usha, accused No.2, who was the key link in
the sex racket, responsible for all the rapes and mass rapes
committed by her male accomplices. Rare again is the long jail
term awarded to her for such a crime.
The `Suryanelli' case has rocked Kerala ever since it broke out
in February 1996. Not just because of the age of the girl and the
number of the persons involved, but also because of the number of
political activists involved. Those sentenced include a former
District Congress-I Committee secretary, a former University
union chairman and several local-level politicians. The girl had
pointed accusing finger at the former Union Minister, Prof. P.J.
Kurian, but his trial has been stayed by the Supreme Court. Small
wonder then, that the `Suryanelli case' has remained a political
issue in the region. The two major political fronts volleyed it
every time an election was held. Prof. Kurian lost his Lok Sabha
election in Idukki last year mainly because of the scandal.
Suryanelli, some 20 km from Munnar, had been a sleepy mountainous
village in the folds of the high ranges in Kerala's Idukki
district - until January 16, 1996. That day, the 16-year- old
class IX student from the village who attended school in Munnar,
was abducted by a bus conductor known to her. The conductor
handed her over to a female pimp, Usha who, in collusion with
other racketeers `
rented' her to some 40 men.
After a 42-day ordeal, the girl was sent back home by the
abductors. By the time she returned, her body was host to a
number of infections and her mind was deeply scarred. A few weeks
after her return, the girl had narrated to this reporter the
agonies she had passed through. Throughout the interview, her
face was flat, her eyes were dry. As she recounted her traumas as
if they had happened to another person, it was hard for the
interviewer to hold back his tears (the interview was never
written).
Surprisingly, when the family decided to bring the culprits to
book almost everybody opposed it. The Munnar police wanted the
family to withdraw the complaint (three of the policemen have now
been suspended following the special court's strictures);
relatives and friends advised them to keep quiet for fear of
social stigma. But the family was determined. The result: they
were isolated. The relatives disowned them, the friends looked
the other way, the society shunned them. A section of the media
was initially guilty of reporting the explicit details of the
girl's woes, thus allowing its readers to take part in a
collective voyeurism.
Visiting the family a couple of years after the marathon legal
battle started, the father told this reporter that the family had
used up its humble savings of a lifetime and that the case had
ruined his and his wife's health. There were times when the three
seriously considered a suicide pact. But the battle had to be
won.
For over four years now, surrounded by policemen posted by the
Government for her `protection', the girl has been almost under
`house arrest' for over four years. In a humble two- room quarter
on a desolate, cold mountain slope, she used to spend most of the
day in loneliness. She has no friends; there are no visitors. She
could not step out of home, even to go to church, without the
policemen in tow. Hopefully, this would change now.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Radars may soon monitor ship movements in Kutch Next : Army condoles death of foreign mercenaries | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|