|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 03, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Next
Fodder scam accused questions impartiality of probe
By Our Special Correspondent
PATNA, SEPT. 2. Almost four years after the fodder scam case
surfaced and the investigation nearing closure, a senior IAS
officer, Mr. K. Arumugam, one of the accused in the case, has
questioned the impartiality of the probe by the CBI and the IT
department and that of the monitoring bench of the Patna High
Court.
Mr. Arumugam has in his 130-page complaint addressed to the Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court, Mr. Justice A. S. Anand, has prayed
for an enquiry into the omissions and commissions of not only the
two Judges of the monitoring bench, but also officials of the CBI
and the Income Tax Department, with respect to the investigation
into the multi-crore fradulent withdrawal scam.
Mr. Arumugam released copies of his letter to the press after
informing the Registrar General of the apex court of his decision
to do so. He charged that the bench had put the credibility and
dignity of the court at stake and the officials of the two
agencies were abusing their power and violating human rights.
Mr. Arumugam, former Secretary of the Animal Husbandry
department, charged that the division bench, comprising Mr.
Justice S. N. Jha and S. J. Mukhopadhyaay, had failed to restrain
the partisan and harassment-oriented investigation and granted
undue encouragement and protection to the CBI Joint Director, Dr.
U. N. Biswas, in violation of the Supreme Court's order.
The letter alleged that the objective was to nail only a certain
set of politicians and officials including with the former Chief
Minister, Mr. Laloo Prasad Yadav. He wondered why the Judges had
meddled with the execution of arrest warrant against Mr. Yadav
and ordered army intervention when the matter pertained to the
designated court which had issued the non-bailable arrest
warrants. He also pointed out that the monitoring bench had not
taken interest in putting pressure on the CBI to get all the
other accused arrested, most of whom are still at large.Mr.
Arumugam alleged that the functioning of various courts was
impaired by extraneous circumstances and delay in the disposal of
bail petitions both at the lower and the High Court levels. He
pointed to the death of a tribal officer even as his bail
petition was pending disposal by the CBI designated court.
Mr. Arumugam has appended the condolence message adopted by the
inmates of the Patna central jail, Beur, which held the CBI and
the lower court responsible for death of Mr. Ashok Kumar Tudu,
who had collapsed inside the court room when he was produced. He
also referred to the suicide committed by one of the accused
following his torture by the CBI.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Next : ISI enticing poor Meos in Haryana? | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|