|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 03, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Russia, China hail decision on NMD
MOSCOW, SEPT. 2. Russia and China, the most vocal critics of the
U.S. plans to deploy a National Missile Defence (NMD) system,
have welcomed a decision by the U.S. President, Mr. Bill Clinton,
to leave the issue to his successor.
The Kremlin in a statement on Saturday said: ``U.S. President
Bill Clinton's decision not to take obligations to deploy the
system of National Anti-Missile Defence is seen in Russia as a
well-thought and responsible step,'' the statement quoted Mr.
Putin as saying. ``There is no doubt this step will lead to
strengthening strategic stability and security in the whole
world, and will strengthen the authority of the United States in
the eyes of the international community,'' Mr. Putin said.
China termed the U.S. move as ``rational'' and called for more
talks on the issue.
Beijing had taken note of the decision, and held that the
decision was ``rational'', the Chinese Foreign Ministry
spokesman, Mr. Zhu Bangzao, said.
``We hope the U.S. Government will have more contact and
discussions with other countries on the matter, so as to make a
decision which could serve the interests of countries and people
all over the world,'' Mr. Zhu was quoted as saying by the
official Xinhua news agency.
Sridhar Krishnaswami reports from Washington:
Mr. Clinton put off a decision on the NMD, saying that he lacked
``absolute confidence'' in the existing technology. In a speech
at Georgetown University, he said he was leaving the decision on
the issue to his successor, a position which the Grand Old Party
had been pushing for all these months.
``A National Missile Defence, if deployed, should be a part of a
larger strategy to preserve and enhance the peace, strength and
security we now enjoy and to build an even safer world. I have
tried to maximise the ability of the next President to pursue
that strategy'', Mr. Clinton said.
He effectively made the argument that the U.S. needed to utilise
the time to narrow differences with the Russians; to rope in
allies of America who are highly sceptical as also to study the
implications the system was going to have in the Asian security
environment that includes China and South Asia.
``We must consider the impact of a decision to deploy on the
security in Asia. As the next President makes a deployment
decision, he will need to avoid stimulating an already dangerous
regional capability from China to South Asia'', Mr. Clinton said.
He, at the same time, also stressed that no country could ever
dictate American security policy. ``Even if the United States and
Russia cannot reach an agreement; even if we cannot secure the
support of our allies first; even if we conclude that the Chinese
will respond to NMD by increasing their arsenal of nuclear
weapons substantially with a corollary inevitable impact in India
and then in Pakistan.''
Mr. Clinton came to a final decision on the NMD based on the
recommendations he received from the Secretaries of State and
Defence and his National Security Advisor. What he has done is to
block the Pentagon from at least handing contracts for the start
of a radar system in the Aleutian Islands. The original thinking
was that even if the President was going to defer a decision on
the NMD he would authorise some work on the system.
The President's remark on not having absolute confidence in the
technology is reflective, to a certain degree, of the results of
tests. Of the 19 tests that have been planned in all, only three
have taken place; and two of these have failed. Still, there are
many in the administration who are convinced that the system will
work even if opponents of the NMD have called it a pipedream and
something even more esoteric than Mr. Ronald Reagan's ``Star
Wars''.
Invoking lack of technology was a convenient cloak for the larger
political decision Mr. Clinton seems to have made. The Democratic
nominee, Mr. Albert Gore Jr., has not been definitive on the NMD
saying that he supported development work. But Democrats on
Capitol Hill, even if convinced of the missile threats to the
country from the so-called rogue nations, have been wary of
endorsing a system that did not have the backing of Western
allies.
The GOP's nominee, Mr. George W. Bush, is a fervent supporter of
the NMD and says he will go for a more ``robust'' system that
will take care of all the States in America and allies as well.
How a Bush administration will fund the project is a different
story and one that has not been explained in any detail. The
estimated cost for the NMD that will take care of the 50 States
in the country is put around $ 60 billions; and several times
more if Mr. Bush's ``robust'' proposal is put into action.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : IMF team in Pak. to assess state of economy Next : Junta breaks protest by Suu Kyi, aides | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|