|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, August 30, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Panel not to insist on U.P.CM's presence
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, AUG. 29. The Liberhan Ayodhya Commission of Enquiry
told the Delhi High Court today that it would not insist on the
presence of the former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister, Mr. Kalyan
Singh, before it on the next date of hearing, September 4.
The assurance from counsel for the Commission came when he sought
two weeks to file certain documents to the court in response to a
petition by the former Chief Minister seeking direction to
restrain the Commission from summoning him to depose before it.
Mr. Justice Manmohan Sarin asked the Commission's counsel to file
an affidavit, if he desired, in reply to the submission made in
the petition. The matter was adjourned for September 20.
The Solicitor-General of India, Mr. Harish Salve, said that he
would assist the court in settling the matter.
The High Court on August 22 issued notices to the Union
Government, the Commission and the Uttar Pradesh Government on
Mr. Singh's petition.
The Commission, which was constituted by the Central Government
on December 16, 1992, has been enquiring into the circumstances
leading to the demolition of the disputed structure (Babri
Masjid), and particularly the role of Mr. Singh when he was the
State's Chief Minister as well his Cabinet colleagues with regard
to the security lapses which led to the demolition on December 6,
1992.
In the writ petition, Mr. Singh has challenged the power of the
Commission to summon him as a court witness and subject him to
cross-examination on the ground that he is the main accused in a
criminal case in connection with the same incident pending in a
Lucknow court.
His argument is that a person who is likely to be prejudiced by
rendering findings against him should not be called upon to give
evidence in the form of an affidavit.
When on August 4 Mr. Singh did not respond to the summons, the
Commission issued bailable warrants for his appearance. However,
the Commission cancelled the bailable warrants when his counsel
gave an undertaking to it that Mr. Singh would appear on August
18.
However that day, he failed to honour his commitment to the
Commission.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Army rescues 250 Next : CBI asked to file reply on cranes purchase | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|