|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, August 21, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
A multipronged strategy to shore up the rupee
By C. R. L. Narasimhan
The Reserve Bank of India diktat to exporters allowed to keep
part of their earnings in dollars is an interesting development
and has to be understood in a larger context than is apparent. On
August 14, the RBI asked exporters who hold dollar denominated
EEFC accounts to repatriate 50 per cent of their balances (as on
August 11) into the country in about 10 days time. Since the
direction was given at a time when the rupee was fast
depreciating against the dollar, it was naturally inferred that
the $1 billion or so which were expected to come in would relieve
the pressure in two ways: one, by adding to the country's forex
reserves; when the RBI has to intervene by supplying dollars
(selling) the extra dollars will naturally count. Second, if the
estimated dollars do come in, it may just turn out to be the
catalyst spurring other inward remittances. The RBI can then
claim success on the more important parameter of influencing the
market sentiment.
Over the past few weeks it has been the negative sentiment as
much as the well-known mismatch between demand for and supply of
dollars that had weighed down the rupee. That is also why the
classic rupee support measures of June 21 - a hike in the Bank
Rate and so on - has had little corrective impact on the rupee
dollar equation.
Sentiment matters most
In fact the sentiment for or against a particular currency is
something which everyone connected with forex markets has to
reckon with. Every serious market player - he need not
necessarily be "a speculator" - has to take a view on its near
term prospects in relation to another currency.
How have the exporters and importers viewed the recent rupee
declines? As the RBI said in its August 3 press release,
speculative forces in the forex markets have been kept under
check as a result of certain earlier measures.
But even outside of speculative demand for foreign exchange,
genuine "leads and lags" in respect of genuine import demand and
export realisation can have a large impact on the demand-supply
position in the short-run.
Because of the negative sentiment against the rupee, importers
rush in while exporters wait for a higher realisation. The former
would like to buy the dollars not only for their immediate needs
but for future requirements too. (This is possible through
forward contracts). On the other hand, the exporters and others
who have foreign exchange wait till the last possible minute to
convert into rupees.
Hence, it is that even without pure speculation there could be
genuine short-term pressures in the forex markets. As the RBI
says it has to take appropriate measures to stabilise
expectations. It is in this context the directive to the EEFC
account holders makes particular sense.
The RBI approach is based on two premises: the recent sterling
export performance has not caused a corresponding increase in
forex inflows into the country. Between February and June this
year exports were around $18 billion. The implication is that the
exporters are delaying their remittances, hoping that when the
rupee depreciates further they can book a larger realisation.
Second, with the onset of Foreign Exchange Management Act, the
rupee is virtually convertible on current account. Making this
point, the RBI says that with the commencement of the new regime
incentive schemes such as the EEFC have probably outlived their
relevance.
However, export organisations have a different viewpoint.
Targeting the exporters' money to shore up the rupee may not by
itself help correct the imbalance, they say.
This point has some validity. The EEFC account balances are now
in the region of $2 billion. By forcing half of it to be
converted into rupees, the RBI will not be achieving anything
consequential. Further, exporters have to be savvy about matters
relating to exchange rates.
One of the main reasons why facilities such as the EEFC were
first given was that export activity had to be rewarded and
exchange earners given special incentives.
In India like in most other countries the American dollar is the
benchmark, the currency against which every other currency's
exchange rate is measured. Part of the reason of course is the
primacy of the dollar in international trade and finance, which
even the emergence of the euro has been unable to challenge.
In inter-bank trades seldom does one find a quote for the dollar
but only for some other currency say the British pound or the yen
against the dollar.
The dollar-centric approach is a fact that cannot be wished away.
In India that approach has had one unfortunate consequence. Even
the RBI which has quite correctly - but so far unsuccessfully -
been trying to say that forex rates are more than just the
dollar-rupee rate will admit that is practically impossible to
change that perception easily.
So what other practical steps can be taken to shore up the rupee?
The real cause for the pressure on the rupee came from the stock
markets with FII outflows causing a dent in forex reserves as
well as on the stability of stock prices.
Nearly $1.8 billion of forex reserves have been depleted from the
beginning of the financial year. The other major reason is that
foreign direct investment has not materialised to the extent
hoped for.
Over both - FII and FDI - the monetary policy can have only an
indirect influence. But a less volatile forex market and a more
stable rupee, which the current RBI measures hope to deliver,
will change the sentiment for the better.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : Tisco launches web site Next : Personal finance portal | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|