|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, July 09, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
Courteous Courtney
THE day that Hansie Cronje testified before the King Commission
of Inquiry, I was watching Courtney Walsh bowl out England on the
first morning of a Test match. The contrast was telling. As
cricketer and human being, the Jamaican is all that the modern
game is not - straightforward and utterly accomplished. This day
he bowled an immaculate line, on or outside the off stump, the
ball now deviating three inches one way, now three inches the
other. When the batsman was beaten, Courtney offered a quizzical
smile. In similar circumstances, a man like Glen McGrath would
have used a four-letter word, or perhaps several.
Indians first saw Walsh bowl during the 1987 World Cup. His team
did not figure in the two matches I went to, but I did watch him
on the box. What stood out was the lovely late movement off the
seam. He usually bowled his first five overs for half-a-dozen
runs and a wicket, but was then taken off by his captain, Vivian
Richards. The batsmen got set against the lesser bowlers, and by
the time Walsh was brought back it was too late. I believed then,
and believe now, that this was a colossal error of captaincy.
Walsh should have bowled his quota at a stretch, with the new
ball, thus reducing the other side to 30 for three. The
mechanical strategy followed by Richards contributed to his
team's early exit from the competition. They might yet have made
the semi-finals, except that at a key moment in a key match
against Pakistan, Walsh, ever the gentleman, refused to run out
Salim Jaffer when he backed up too far.
Later that winter I watched, at the ground, two days of a Test in
New Delhi. I had a special interest in the match, for my former
college captain Arun Lal was playing. On the first morning the
home side were bowled out for 75, Patrick Patterson claiming five
wickets. Arun battled hard, for 25, before falling to a wicked
delivery from Winston Davis. Walsh's only victim, if a
considerable one, was Kapil Dev, caught behind off an outswinger.
Remarkably, a side whose top three were Greenidge, Haynes and
Richards answered with a mere 127 all out. Walsh, with 16, was
third top scorer I confess I remember nothing of that innings.
But I do recall him bowling when India batted again. Srikkanth
and Raman Lamba went early, but then Arun Lal and Dilip
Vengsarkar got together in a fine, retrieving stand. Arun, who
was essentially a backfoot player, hit some square cuts and pulls
before being thought out by Walsh. Two men were placed on the
fence, and a series of short balls bowled. Arun left three or
four alone before hooking the fifth down the throat of deep
square leg. The batsman was set and the wicket was dead: had he
restrained himself, a century was there for the taking. To watch
my friend walk off the Kotla, muttering to himself, ranks as one
of the most sorrowful moments in a lifetime of cricket watching.
The only other time I was at a ground while Walsh bowled in a
Test match was at Lord's, four years later. When West Indies
batted, Richards made 60, and that superbly gifted under-
performer, Carl Hooper, stroked his first Test hundred. Then
England went in, and Courtney Walsh and his comrade Curtly
Ambrose got to work. Graham Gooch lost sight of a Walsh in-dipper
delivered at about a million miles an hour. The ball curved in
late to take the off-stump, the England captain not offering a
shot. This brought in Greame Hick, in his first Test. Born in
Zimbabwe, the prodigy had to wait seven years before qualifying
for England. From the first weeks of this summer of 1991 he was
being advertised as the Great White Hope of English cricket -
indeed, he was not above a bit of self-promotion himself,
releasing, prior to the Lord's Test, a book with the Churchillian
title, My Early Life. If the West Indians had not read the book
they seemed to have read about it, for they subjected him to a
torrid baptism. Ambrose came pounding in from the Pavilion End,
long loping strides in seven-league boots. I quaked from where I
sat, and poor Hick was at least 80 yards closer. One at the chin,
a second at the chest, the third aimed at the head and flying
just over. Then the sucker punch, a fast, full straight ball
outside off stump. Hick reached for it, and Jeffrey Dujon had the
two hundredth catch of his career.
Almost a decade has gone by, and Walsh and Ambrose are yet
bowling out England. Before this summer's series began, an
English commentator incautiously pointed out that the West Indies
had lost, on the trot, the last 10 Test matches they had played
on foreign soil. He forgot to add that these were played against
South Africa, Pakistan and New Zealand. As always, it was the
sight of their erstwhile rulers that would bring out the best.
This will be the last series in which Walsh and Ambrose shall
bowl together. Their partnership is almost like a marriage, a
successful marriage, with the partners growing old, companionably
and gracefully. And like most marriages, in their long time
together, the first one has been dominant, than the other. In the
early 1990's Walsh was the steady foil to the deadly Ambrose. The
Antiguan delivered the ball from 10 feet or more; to that
steepling bounce was added a sharp inward movement. It was
Ambrose who would get six wickets as the West Indies bowled out
sides for less than a 100. But as he has aged, the bounce has
become less steep and the movement has, more or less,
disappeared. The spirit is still willing but the flesh is weak.
By custom he takes the new ball, but it is his partner who is
more likely now to run through a side. Walsh's run up is easy and
economical, and the arm high. A better physique, and years of
playing county cricket, have allowed him to more effectively stay
abreast of the competition. He takes more wickets, each greeted
with unreserved joy by Ambrose.
The union of Ambrose and Walsh has been perhaps the happiest of
the great fast bowling partnerships. With Hall and Griffith,
Lillee and Thompson, Truman and Statham, there was always a
competitive edge - one man wanted to outdo the other. Only
Lindwall and Miller were like the West Indians: friends as well
as partners. On tour, the Australians even roomed together. So
complete was their trust that each left his money on the table
between their beds - to be picked up, when wanted, by either.
Lindwall and Miller bowled in tandem from 1946 to 1956. The West
Indians have been together even longer. Now, at last, they too
have fallen victim to Anno Domini. The announcement of Ambrose's
retirement has been categorical - after the present series he
will play no more for the West Indies. Walsh has not committed
himself, either way. But one suspects, and one hopes, that he
will play for a further season or two.
To watch Courtney Walsh bowl is to be educated. To watch him bat
is to be entertained. He is now the only genuine tail-ender left
in international cricket, the last relic of a once abundant
species. He holds the world record for the most Test wickets, and
another world record for the most ducks. To this Indian, he
joyfully recalls a bygone era, when men such as B. S.
Chandrasekhar batted with an equal, and equally cheerful,
incompetence. Consider how Walsh leaves alone a ball outside the
off stump, his bat curled inwards, his feet off the ground. Or
how, with a curious hop-hop, he plays, or attempts to play, the
shorter delivery. Words cannot accurately describe either stroke.
Let me say only that to watch Walsh bat is worth the price of
admission to any cricket ground in the world.
And yet, in this strangest of games, Walsh has helped his side
win two Test matches with the bat, these in successive seasons,
aided the first time by Brian Lara and the second by Jimmy Adams.
Of course he has won many more matches for the West Indies with
the ball. In the end, though, he will be remembered as much for
the quality of his character as for the quality of his bowling.
The modern game is driven by the will to win for one's side or
one's country. There is nothing at all wrong with this, except
that in some men, the Australians most especially, this
translates into an other-hating xenophobia. Let us, and the young
among us especially, make the most of Walsh while we can.
No other cricketer in recent times has so effectively combined
competitiveness with courtesy.
RAMACHANDRA GUHA
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Tendulkar to lead Asian team Next : Mohun Bagan moves into final | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|