|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, June 30, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
Chart IT route, CAs told
By Our Special Correspondent
CHENNAI, JUNE 29. ``Specialise or perish'' is the message that
senior professionals as also policymakers today sought to convey
to the one-lakh-strong community of chartered accountants in the
country looking to chart their course in the new millennium.
It is not just use of information technology (IT) as a
prerequisite for successful practice in a globalising economy but
also the need for shunning the decades-old dependence on
statutory work by the ``one-qualification profession'' that came
to be highlighted, as the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India (ICAI) wound up its two-year-long golden jubilee
celebrations with a conference devoted to the theme ``auditing in
the new millennium''.
The speakers emphasised that specialisation from among a long
menu, including taxation laws of specific countries, financial
management, due diligence, mergers and acquisitions and
intellectual property rights should be resorted to by
professionals aspiring for success, while the Government should
facilitate changes in laws, rules and syllabi. Accountants could
even design financial e-commerce portals, taking care to accept
only consultancy fee and not a share in profits to comply with
existing regulations, the conference was told.
The Tamil Nadu Minister for Education, Mr. K. Anbazhagan, who
inaugurated the conference, set the tone by emphasising that the
CA qualification could henceforth be considered only a
prerequisite for entry into the profession where those with a
``flair for technology'' would score over colleagues.
Mr. N. Rangachary, Chairman of the Insurance Regulatory and
Development Authority (IRDA), asked accountants to prepare
themselves for ``cross-border movement'' of professionals and
``acceptance of reciprocal arrangements''. (Both these issues are
under discussion under the auspices of the WTO in Geneva).
Warning the leadership of the institute that ``frustration'' was
spreading among younger members of the profession over
insufficient scope for advancement and excellence, Mr. Rangachary
said chartered accountants would have no alternative to adoption
of international accounting standards. He said the ICAI should
have a ``relook'' at its regulations and consider combined
practice by professionals of various disciplines. Mr. Rahul Roy,
former president, ICAI, said while on the one hand ``tectonic
changes'' had been brought about in the world by the Internet
revolution, on the other professionals in India carrying the
``baggage of the past'' were showing ``withdrawal symptoms'' as a
result of withdrawal of statutory support.
They should shed diffidence and look for opportunities in the
knowledge-led and globalised environment. They should try to
emulate multinational professional firms by setting up ``boutique
shops'' offering specialised services in narrow fields allied to
accountancy and ``department stores'' offering multidisciplinary
services under a single roof.
Mr. Roy said the profession would not be able to develop
``branding'' with a single qualification for people with varying
talents, and with outdated regulations that barred advertising
and soliciting. Such laws violated the consumer's right to know
the quality of the product/service he was buying.
Mr. Y. H. Malegam, senior professional who headed several
committees appointed by the Securities and Exchange of India,
clarified that Indian CAs were not barred from certifying
compliance with the U.S. GAAP (generally accepted accounting
principles) for the satisfaction of customers, but they could not
do so for submission of the accounts to any regulatory authority.
Even in the U.S., only those CPAs (certified public accountants)
who had been designated SEC partners could issue such
certification.
Mr. Balaji Swaminathan highlighted major areas of difference
between Indian and U.S. GAAP, like consolidation of accounts,
revenue recognition, valuation of intangibles and foreign
currency transactions. Absence of peer review and common practice
by various professionals in India was a contentious issue in
multilateral negotiations, he said.
Mr. G. Sitharaman, President, ICAI, said the accounting system
for local bodies evolved by the institute at the instance of the
World Bank had recently been accepted by the State, which was
also set to give a role for CAs in the cooperative sector.
Mr. Anbazhagan released a First Day Cover brought out by the
Department of Posts on the occasion and the second volume of the
history of chartered accountancy in India.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : Yahoo! unveils Indian operations Next : Satyam Computer pact with U.S. firm | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|