|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, June 30, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Sonia writes to PM on salt issue
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, JUNE 29. The Congress President, Ms. Sonia Gandhi, has
demanded that the Vajpayee Government should give up its idea of
reviewing the current policy of compulsory statutory iodisation
of edible salt. The Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
through a notification dated May 11 had indicated the
government's intention to withdraw compulsory iodisation and had
invited views and suggestions from the public before taking a
final view.
In a letter to the Prime Minister, Ms. Sonia has drawn Mr.
Vajpayee's attention to the fact that as long back as 1984 the
then Congress government had decided ``to compulsorily iodinate
all edible salt in India by the year 1990''. The Leader of
Opposition in the Lok Sabha further points out that as a result
of that decision: (a) vast majority of households in the country
has been consuming iodised salt; (b) production of iodised salt
in the country has increased from two lakh tonnes in 1983 to 40
lakhs in 1998; and, (c) almost all the States have prohibited the
sale of non-iodised salt for edible purposes and most of them
provide iodised salt through ration shops.
Ms. Sonia expresses herself unable to appreciate the reason given
the May 11 notification that ``such a public health measure
should not be enforced through statutory provisions. Instead, it
should be propagated through wide publicity and information
dissemination''. What the Congress leader has not mentioned but
is generally conceded by official sources is that the Vajpayee
Government has agreed to review the compulsory iodized salt in
deference to pressure from the Sangh parivar. The government has
given in to the Sangh parivar in the hope that the RSS and other
outfits would allow the government to take radical decisions like
disinvestment, etc.
Ms. Sonia has reminded the Prime Minister that ``elimination of
iodine deficiency has been advocated by the WHO Assembly in 1990,
the World Summit for Children in 1990, the International
Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1992, and by SAARC in
the same year. India is a signatory to all these resolutions''.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Poor response to Jammu bandh Next : Focus again on Gupta leadership | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|