|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, June 18, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
West fears fresh arms race
By Batuk Gathani
BRUSSELS, JUNE 17. The decision of the Russian President, Mr.
Vladimir Putin, to visit North Korea in mid-July has evoked much
interest as this is the first trip of its kind by a Russian
leader. The decision has surprised many Western officials as
North Korea is widely suspected of selling long-range missile
technology to ``rouge states''.
Mr. Putin's visit in the aftermath of the North-South Korean
summit would give him a fresh perspective of the future
developments in the region, especially the impact on the defence
strategies of the U.S. and Russia. North Korea's spectacular
advances in the development of short and long-range nuclear
missile systems coupled with South Korea's growing industrial and
economic clout in the eastern Asian region have a special
significance.
The visit is interpreted in the Western media as an attempt to
counter the Clinton administration's plan for the National
Missile Defence (NMD). The moot point is if Russia also rates
North Korea as a ``rouge state'' as the U.S. does. The European
quandary also highlights the differing perceptions between the
U.S. and Russia over defence strategy which may portend a fresh
arms race with the collapse of the ABM treaty.
In some Western quarters, Russia and China are also seen as
willing sellers of nuclear missile technology. Indian observers,
like many Europeans, are also watching the unfolding scenario of
long-range nuclear missile strategy with some dismay and
trepidation.
The Japanese media notes that the visit takes place just before
the summit of the world's richest industrial nations in Japan,
from July 21 to 23. This has evoked much interest and speculation
in the European media.
It is ironical that prominent American commentators are now
overtly wondering why the so-called American ``infatuation'' with
the strategic missile defence `baffles' Europe. This is in the
background of the U.S. President, Mr. Bill Clinton's meeting with
Mr. Putin on June 4. In Moscow, the two leaders found themselves
at odds over the American plan for the deployment of a limited
anti-missile strategy.
Under the proposed strategy, the U.S. proposes to amend the 1972
Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) treaty, to allow limited land-based
defence against future limited missile attacks, not from Russia
but from the so-called `rouge' states. However, the Russian
Defence Minister, Mr. Sergeyev, met senior officials at the NATO
headquarters here for two hours last Friday. He briefed them on
the joint missile defence project outlined by Moscow. He said the
Russian proposals were first broached in Rome early this month by
Mr. Putin.
The Russian perception is that the current proposals would `fall
safely' within the 1997 demarcation agreement between U.S. and
Russia, that would permit regional defence against missile sites
with a range of less than 3520 km. The U.S.-Russian pact has not
been ratified by anybody.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Gates yearns for privacy | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|