|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, June 14, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
Rajasthan tax hits gold trade
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, JUNE 13.
The unjustified decision of the Rajasthan Government to stick to
the sales tax rate of 0.05 per cent on gold has not only badly
hit gold trade in the Capital, but also resulted in a spurt in
smuggling of the yellow metal from the neighbouring State.
While gold attracts sales tax of one per cent in the Capital, the
Rajasthan Government, as part of an incentive scheme and contrary
to the spirit of Uniform Sales Tax, is levying only 0.05 per cent
sales tax on the gold bought by traders from Handicrafts
Associations, Minerals and Mines Trading Corporation (MMTC),
State Trading Corporation and the nationalised banks. This has
hit the bullion trade badly in Delhi resulting in exodus of
traders and outflow of revenue.
Officials are of the view that if the Rajasthan Government is not
forced to adopt the new uniform rate, it would not only have an
adverse impact on the overall revenue collections but also result
in large scale smuggling of the commodity. Already the impact of
smuggling is being felt as the official trade in Delhi has
recorded a massive decline as a result of gold being smuggled
from Rajasthan.
Under pressure from the traders to bring down the sales tax rate,
the Delhi Government is of the view that if Rajasthan does not
revert to the one per cent rate, Delhi too would be forced to
take a decision which could have an adverse fallout on the
country-wide level.
In fact, the issue was raised by the Delhi Finance Department
officials and the Finance Minister of Delhi, Mr. Mahinder Singh
Saathi, at a meeting of the Coordination Committee on Sales Tax
held in Delhi on June 7. It was pointed out that after the entire
country had adopted the uniform floor rates, it was not right on
the part of Rajasthan to continue with the old rates for gold
which had resulted in uneven competition.
In fact, Bullion Traders Association, Delhi, has blamed the Delhi
Government for not studying the facts and going ahead with the
decision to implement the new rates. They claim that many traders
have shifted trade to Rajasthan as the demand had come down by 70
per cent in the month of May. As for June, the situation was even
worse.
They alleged that despite making representations to the Delhi
Finance Minister, nothing has happened and warned that they would
be forced to take the drastic step of launching an agitation.
Officials in the Delhi Government said they had already got in
touch with their counterparts in Rajasthan and have sought an
immediate solution to the problem. The response from Rajasthan
was quite positive and it was hoped the anomaly would be removed
very soon, officials added.
At the same time, officials in the Sales Tax Department refuted
the allegations of the traders and instead charged them with
adopting a callous attitude in this regard. ``A representation of
the Bullion Traders Association met the Sales Tax Commissioner
only last week and informed him about their problem. The
notification was issued by Rajasthan in November last year. What
were the traders doing all these months?'' a senior official
asked.
Acknowledging that the grievance of the traders was to some
extent correct, the official wondered what took so long for the
traders to take up the cause. The uniform rates came into effect
from January 16 and it took nearly five months for the traders to
react. It was only when their trade started getting affected that
the traders woke up to the reality.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : Delhi govt. schools to go computer savvy Next : A platform to showcase Indian films | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|