|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, June 14, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Jayalalitha for diplomatic solution
By Our Staff Reporter
THANJAVUR, JUNE 13. The AIADMK general secretary, Ms.
Jayalalitha, today called for a ``diplomatic and political
solution'' to the Sri Lankan crisis that would protect the
interests of the Tamils without affecting the territorial
integrity and sovereignty of the island nation.
Addressing a press conference, she said it was the duty of the
Indian Government to help the Sri Lankan Government arrive at a
solution to the ethnic conflict.
Asked for her reaction to the Czechoslovakian model suggested by
the Chief Minister, Mr. M. Karunanidhi, she said the Chief
Minister was contradicting his own statements every other day.
``He is a victim of confusion'', she said.
On the Indian offer of assistance to Sri Lanka made during the
visit of the External Affairs Minister, Mr. Jaswant Singh, to
Colombo, she said: ``We don't know the outcome of the talks.''
Ms. Jayalalitha, however, welcomed the stand taken by the NDA
Government at the Centre on Sri Lanka: ``The Central Government
has taken the right stand''.
``If we interfere in the territorial integrity of Sri Lanka, we
will have to encounter such interference in our country. If we
ask for a separate Eelam, Pakistanis will ask for separate
Kashmir and separatist tendencies will emerge in the north
east'', she said.
On allowing a role for the LTTE, she said the AIADMK had declared
the LTTE as a terrorist organisation . ``We don't consider LTTE
as the sole representative of Tamils in Sri Lanka. I was
instrumental in getting the first ban on LTTE'' and also
insistent on its continuance.
Referring to bomb blasts in churches, Ms. Jayalalitha said that
whoever was responsible should be punished. The acts were
condemnable. Both the State and Central Governments should take
firm steps to see that such acts did not recur.
With respect to economic liberalisation, she said the AIADMK
stand was that the Indian economy should be integrated with the
global economy, but not at the cost of domestic industries.
``That was why I objected to the move by the Commerce Minister,
Mr.Murasoli Maran, bringing 700-odd items in OGL''. Regarding
Union Minister, Mr. Ram Vilas Paswan's announcement that telecom
employees would get free telephones, she said it was not a
healthy trend for the country. The decision would entertain
demands from various sections which the Government would not be
able to meet.
On the question of nuclear weaponisation, Ms. Jayalalitha said
that India could not give up its nuclear programmes until
countries like Russia and the United States destroyed their
stockpile. She did not consider spending on arms as a wasteful
expenditure since it involved the security of the country.
Asked about the performance of BJP Government at the Centre, she
said ``there was only non-performance''. Most of the Ministers,
except Ms. Mamata Bannerjee and Mr. L. K. Advani, did not meet
even the MPs. The BJP Government had done nothing to address the
basic needs of the people and contain the price of essential
commodities. In a country like India where people below poverty
line were many, a social safety net was a must, she said.
However, Ms. Jayalalitha said she did not consider the coalition
form of the NDA Government as a ``hurdle'' to its performance.
Asked whether AIADMK, which was a partner in the previous
coalition Government led by the BJP at the Centre, would favour a
coalition Government in the State, Ms. Jayalalitha said ``No''.
``We are categorical in saying that there will not be coalition
Government in the State. We will form the Government on our
own.'' But coalition Governments at the Centre had come to stay.
She said that the AIADMK would decide on its alliances only at
the time of elections. Regarding free supply of electricity to
farmers, she said that Mr. M. Karunanidhi introduced the
concession in 1991 with the sole intention of putting the
successor Government in trouble. But in a country like India,
concessions once given could not be withdrawn.
To a question whether the party image suffered erosion after
adverse judgements in special courts, she said: ``Why can't you
wait till next election and see what the people think''.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Capturing temple architecture on paper Next : Shifting of blast accused to Coimbatore jail ordered | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|