|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, June 14, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Uncertainty over `rural weightage' continues
By B. K. Vittal
BANGALORE, JUNE 13. The exercise undertaken by the Government to
restore the scheme to give 10 per cent weightage in marks to
rural candidates in the State services, which was struck down by
the High Court, is still to bear fruit and its materialising
within the time-limit of three months set for it appears dim.
The reason is that the three-member commission constituted by the
Government to suggest measures to rectify some of the
deficiencies pointed out by the High Court is yet to come to
grips with certain delicate issues involved, according to
sources.
The commission, headed by Mr. Ramakrishna, a retired High Court
Judge, set up some time in March, had been asked to submit its
report within three months so that what was called the rural
weightage rule could be revived. One of the issues it had been
asked to go into was whether rural areas with a population of
less than 50,000 suffered from educational backwardness to be
eligible for the weightage.
It is stated that one of the suggestions before the commission
was for holding a sample survey in rural areas to determine the
issue, but this had not found favour, specially since secondary
material was available readily with the educational authorities.
The secondary data is by way of results of the SSLC and PUC
examinations. All details, including the number of students
appearing for the two examinations from rural areas every year as
also the percentage of passes from these areas for a number of
years, have been maintained by the two boards concerned.
It is this indecision that has prevented the commission from
going ahead with its work in full speed. The scheme, it may be
recalled, was struck down as void by Mr. Justice J. C. Bharuka of
the High Court in November last, and the Government, within a few
days, preferred an appeal against it to a Division Bench, which
upheld the order of the single Judge.
The Government took the matter to the Supreme Court by way of a
Special Leave Petition. This was dismissed by the court.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Housing: Govt. sets constituency-wise targets Next : Man commits suicide, relatives stage dharna | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|