|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, June 14, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Pak. proposes nuclear restraint regime
By Amit Baruah
ISLAMABAD, JUNE 13. For the first time since the military took
over in Pakistan, the Musharraf Government today offered India a
strategic restraint regime in both the nuclear and conventional
fields on a ``reciprocal basis''.
In a statement ahead of the resumption of the non- proliferation
dialogue between Pakistan and the United States from June 15, an
official statement said, ``Pakistan has proposed to India a
strategic restraint regime for avoidance of an arms race, nuclear
and conventional, and confidence-building in the region. We are
willing to consider any restraint arrangement on a reciprocal
basis with India.''
The offer was first made by Pakistan during the October 15-18,
1998 Foreign Secretary-level talks held here under the ``two plus
six'' dialogue structure agreed to in June 1997.
Today's offer has been made by the military regime while the
earlier proposal came from the civilian Nawaz Sharif Government.
India and Pakistan discussed nuclear risk reduction measures in
October 1998 and the issue came up for discussion in the Lahore
round as well.
A memorandum of understanding signed by the Foreign Secretaries
in Lahore on February 20, 1999 reads: ``The two sides shall
engage in bilateral consultations on security concepts and
nuclear doctrines, with a view to developing measures for
confidence-building in the nuclear and conventional fields, aimed
at avoidance of conflict.'' In fact, experts from the two
countries were to meet after the Lahore round to discuss these
issues when Pakistan embarked on Kargil and upset the process of
bilateral engagement.
In today's statement, two days before the Foreign Minister, Mr.
Abdul Sattar, meets the U.S. Deputy Secretary of State, Mr.
Strobe Talbott, in Washington, Pakistan stated it was committed
to a ``policy of responsibility and restraint'' on nuclear
issues. ``The Government welcomes the resumption of dialogue with
the U.S. because it represents an important effort at preventing
a nuclear arms race and arms build-up in South Asia, where the
security climate continues to remain tense on account of the
unresolved Jammu and Kashmir dispute,'' it said.
The ninth round of dialogue between the U.S. and Pakistan, like
the earlier ones, will focus on American concerns relating to
nuclear export controls, the CTBT, a moratorium on production of
fissile material pending negotiations on the FMCT, a halt to
missile development and Islamabad agreeing to CBMs with New Delhi
to reduce nuclear dangers.
This will be the first formal engagement between the U.S. and
Pakistan on these issues after the October 12, 1999 military
coup. There is little doubt that the ``restraint'' proposal has
been made in a calculated fashion before Mr. Sattar's talks with
Mr. Talbott. However, the military Government has now re-
committed itself publicly to such measures.
One of the problems that cropped up in October 1998 was that
Pakistan insisted on linking its ``strategic restraint regime''
to Kashmir, which was unacceptable to India. Hopefully, Pakistan
may have realised by now that projecting Kashmir as a ``nuclear
flashpoint'' has boomeranged. Western countries too have not been
impressed with this linkage.
Nuclear and conventional risk-reduction proposals will have that
much more meaning if they are accompanied by a fundamental
commitment to the bilateral dialogue structure as agreed to by
the Foreign Secretaries in June 1997 and the two Prime Ministers
in February 1999.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : Sinha move to clear bad loans of banks | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|