|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, June 07, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Chirac yields to demand on tenure
By Vaiju Naravane
PARIS, JUNE 6. In a televised interview late Monday, the French
President, Mr. Jacques Chirac said he was in favour of reducing
the French Presidential term from seven to five years, but that
he would not contemplate limiting the re-election of an incumbent
to two terms as had been suggested. These changes would not apply
to Mr. Chirac's present seven-year term which expires in 2002.
A draft Bill will be sent to the National Assembly and Senate as
early as next Monday and a referendum is likely to be held in
October. The next President, if the French vote ``yes'' as they
are overwhelmingly expected to do, will be elected for five years
only. This will be the most significant political reform the
country will have undertaken since the present Constitution of
the Fifth Republic was adopted in 1958.
Tailor-made for France's indomitable post-war President Gen.
Charles de Gaulle, it gave the country a strong executive with
sweeping powers. Parliament was then seen as a pliant
Presidential appendage and was elected for a five-year term. It
was assumed that the towering personality of the President would
automatically translate itself into a parliamentary majority for
his political family.
But in recent years, the French have played cannily at what has
come to be known as co-habitation, where the country's Head of
State and Head of Government belong to opposing political
families. Since the Presidential and parliamentary terms do not
coincide, the French electorate can judge and sanction a
President's performance two years into his mandate by electing a
majority hostile to him. They can similarly sanction the ruling
coalition by electing a President from the other side of the
political spectrum. The President is then obliged to govern with
a Prime Minister who does not necessarily share his views or
concerns. This can become awkward. For under the Constitution the
President is described as being the guarantor of the Constitution
while the Prime Minister is expected to run the country.
Traditionally, foreign affairs and defence are said to be the
President's exclusive preserve. However, the Constitution does
not spell this out. Hence the fuss and consternation recently
when the Prime Minister, Mr. Lionel Jospin on a visit to West
Asia, took an independent line on the Hizbollah's terrorist acts.
The announcement of a five-year term is a significant climb down
for Mr. Chirac, who, less than a year ago, had ruled out any
changes in the Presidential mandate.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : China wary of Russian plan Next : Freedom Party official kicks up another storm | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|