|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, June 03, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Consensus eludes ruling front
By Our Special Correspondent
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JUNE 2. Bilateral discussions between LDF
constituents here today failed to throw up any decision on the
question of sharing the two Rajya Sabha seats up for grabs by the
Front in the June 23 election.
With all the four claimants to the seats remaining unrelenting in
their demands, the Front leadership is faced with protracted
bargaining over the coming one week to break the deadlock. Filing
of nominations for the Rajya Sabha polls would commence on June
5.
The last date for filing papers is June 12 and, going by current
indications, the LDF is likely to finalise its nominees only
towards the eleventh hour.
Today's bilateral exercises began in the morning with discussions
between the CPI(M) and the CPI.
The former was represented at the meeting by the LDF convener,
Mr. V. S. Achuthanandan, and the CPI(M) State secretary, Mr.
Pinarayi Vijayan, and the latter by Mr. P. K. Vasudevan Nair and
Mr. Veliyam Bhargavan.
The CPI leaders told their CPI(M) counterparts that there is no
question of their giving up their claim on the second seat. They
also told the CPI(M) leaders that the appropriate thing to do
would be to honour the commitment given to the RSP at the time of
the last Lok Sabha polls that the first arising vacancy to the
Rajya Sabha would be allotted to it.
The CPI(M) leaders expressed their inability to part with both
seats. That simply foreclosed the possibility of an immediate
understanding on the issue.
The RSP State secretary, Prof. T. J. Chandrachoodan, and the
party State secretariat member, Mr. Sankaran Nair, who
represented his party at the bilateral discussion, did not mince
words when he met the CPI(M) leaders. Besides reminding them
about the promise given to his party, he also pointed out that
the RSP had no representative in Parliament.
When his turn came, the NCP State president, Mr. Ramachandran
Kadannappally, pointed out that his party had every claim to a
berth in the Rajya Sabha as it had been forced to sacrifice the
Kannur and Vadakara Lok Sabha seats.
The understanding then was that Janata Dal's Mr. Arangil
Sreedharan would step down on completion of three years. However,
the LDF decided to go in for Assembly polls in 1991 and lost. Had
Mr. Sreedharan resigned then, the seat would have gone to the
UDF.
This enabled Mr. Sreedharan to remain a Rajya Sabha member for
the full term. According to NCP leaders, other LDF constituents
too are sympathetic towards them.
However, they conceded that everything would depend on how far
the other constituents are willing to accommodate each the other.
Although the rest of the coalition would like the CPI(M) to give
up both seats, everybody knows that it is an inconceivable
proposition. The CPI(M) leaders insist that they cannot do
without at least one seat. The party does not wish to see its
strength in the Rajya Sabha go down in what promises to be an
election year in the State.
Going by the current trend of discussions, no settlement to the
vexed question would be possible without some real give and take
on all sides. And, whichever way it goes, the CPI(M) may once
again emerge as the villain of the piece, at least in the eyes of
the coalition partners.
There was no indication of further discussions between the LDF
constituents till tomorrow. However, beginning Monday, the CPI(M)
leaders would be busy with their State Secretariat and State
Committee meetings to discuss the Muslim League question.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Will the TG reservoir remain safe forever? Next : Major threat to freedom of Press: VS | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|