|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, May 21, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Next
Languages of symbolism
Ganesh Haloi's gouaches and watercolours, on show in Mumbai
recently, reflect a significant shift in direction.The artist
leaves the flatness of topography and constructs new forms. Each
bears witness to the revelry of the natural world, with its
dialogue between the brilliance of a sunburst set against the
vibrancy of a rainbow. RANJIT HOSKOTE writes.
GANESH HALOI belongs to that distinguished lineage of Indian
abstractionist painters who phrase their non-representational
explorations as stylised departures from the landscape. Haloi's
confreres in this lineage include such luminaries as Ram Kumar,
Laxman Shreshtha, Rajendra Dhawan and Akbar Padamsee in his
"Metascapes" phase - these painters are united in their treatment
of the landscape as a pretext to bear contemplative witness to
the cosmic cycles of growth, decay and regeneration. It is not
the visible terrain that we view in their works, but an interplay
between materiality and time, the forces of construction and the
forces of dissolution, the forms of transience and the outlines
of eternity.
In Haloi's paintings, especially, these elements are crafted into
eloquent symbols of the ceaseless human struggle to map the
territory of chaos. Haloi's recent gouaches and watercolours,
which were exhibited at Gallery Lakeeren in suburban Mumbai this
month, represent a small-scale reprise of his larger oeuvre.
Miniature though the paintings were in scale, the exhibition
registered a significant shift of direction on Haloi's part.
Throughout the 1990s, Haloi's gouaches had seemed to fall
naturally into the rhythms of topography: sectors and mudflats
were worked out in spans across the picture surface; intermittent
roads started out in patches that resembled fields, negotiated
rocky terrain, only to peter out. "This is the land I cultivate,"
said the artist to this writer in the summer of 1993, during his
last exhibition in Bombay. He endorsed the metaphor with
expressive hands that blocked the air in quadrilaterals. Reaching
instinctively for a sheet of paper, on that occasion, he had
sketched out a rapid vocabulary of linear forms for me - plotted
across his frames in muted colours, they offered testimony to an
epic history of loss and suffering, the sombre gravity of the
browns and reds relieved only occasionally by hints of luminous
green.
Austerely abstracted though they have been, Haloi's paintings
retain specific connections with the realms of emotional
experience that he has traversed. "Everything begins in pain," he
said to this writer in the course of a conversation. When we
turned to his paintings on that occasion, every element - from
the snake-like road and the dried river-course to the vestigial
thatch hut and the torched boundary of a town - attested to the
harsh truth of that epigrammatic utterance. Every line is skewed,
every array of components strained as though by the forces of
nature. It is as though flood and drought had wreaked their
havoc, leaving the desolation of ruins in their wake.
Haloi's preoccupation with the twin themes of devastation and
resilience is intimately linked to his personal past. Born in
1936, in a district that is now part of Bangladesh, he was 11
years old when the Partition of the subcontinent divided his home
province, and a cyclone of hatred and violence turned him into an
exile. Haloi's earliest memories are with the Brahmaputra, in the
delta region of which he grew up. The painful recollections of
the communitarian holocaust that attended the Partition were to
be painted over these childhood experiences, but the later trauma
could not wholly obscure or obliterate the earlier sense of
idyll.
As in an aerial view, Haloi's paintings allow for the
simultaneous viewing of several interlocking strata. In his
tightly demarcated zones, silence is contrasted with
articulation, stasis with movement, consolidation with upheaval.
Haloi's art has evolved through a series of transitions, from the
pure landscape to the present abstractionist version of the
landscape. The eye is attracted to the stray detail in his works:
a red pug-mark, a deeply marked square, an arrow-head. If a
nostalgia communicates itself through the deserted houses and the
brooding thickets, there is also a stoic acceptance of
transformation.
This is, perhaps, the attitude of the refugee reconciled to the
savagery of time; the awareness of victimhood appears to have
been tempered, for him, by contact with a philosophy of
tranquillity that provides a counterpoint to the disquietudes of
contemporary life. It is probable that this philosophy of
tranquillity first revealed itself to Haloi through the
bejewelled images of Ajanta during the late 1950s and early
1960s, when he worked in the Buddhist cave-sanctuary as an artist
making pictorial records for the Archaeological Survey of India.
The Ajanta murals best incarnate, after all, that interplay of
transience and eternity which fascinates Haloi - in these
portrayals of episodes from Buddhist sacred narrative, the
figures are serene in their seeming indifference to the passage
of time; and yet, as material creations, they are subject to
changes of temperature and humidity, to the corrosive logic of
the sun-dial and the water-clock. It is to Haloi's Ajanta period,
also, that we may trace the archaeological metaphors which define
his art: it is no accident that his pictorial project dwells on
patient digging and exposition, the lyric and melancholy
examination of the tissues of history.
But Haloi's recent paintings are quite differently conceived and
structured. The artist leaves the flatness of topography behind,
and constructs a far more three-dimensional dream reality than he
has so far attempted. Haloi's new forms evince a lightness and
playfulness that they did not formerly exhibit: they bear witness
to the revelry of the natural world, with its dialogue between
lightness and radiance, the percussive brilliance of a sunburst
set against the vibrancy of a rainbow.
The landscape, though not evoked in the physical detail of its
contours, is articulated in its lush brownness and greenness; the
depth and mystery of the forest are invoked. The textures and
colours convey the broad sense of fields, mountains, wastelands
and riverine tracts in these paintings; on the other hand, the
emblematic keys and templates serve to graph hills, river courses
and areas under cultivation across these sensed presences.
It is apparent that these paintings derive their distinctive
energy from a dialectic between two related but opposite
imperatives: the mapmaker's impulse towards ordering the chaotic
sensations provoked by the environment on the one hand, and the
traveller's sensuous delight in the terrain through which he is
passing, on the other. In formal terms, therefore, Haloi now
steers us towards a dialogue between the realm of nature and the
realm of artifice - that is to say, between the object and the
sign.
It is surely significant, in this context, that Haloi's current
paintings should replay the distant resonances emanating from the
first phase of European abstractionist art: in his current forms,
we find refracted the idioms associated with the mystical
Kandinsky, the revolutionary Malevich and the Orphist Delaunay.
By affirming this particular ancestry, Haloi dramatises a
vigorous and even pagan celebration of self-extension.
We would not be mistaken if we were to surmise that his recent
paintings commemorate the effulgent moment when the human
consciousness opens up to the environment, so renewing both
itself and the languages of symbolism through which it expresses
its anguish and exhilaration.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Next : Fresh old tale | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|