|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, May 14, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Regional
| Previous
| Next
No differences between Centre, State: CM
By Our Special Correspondent
CHENNAI, MAY 13. There is no contradiction between the stand of
the Centre and Tamil Nadu Government on the present crisis in Sri
Lanka, Chief Minister, Mr. M. Karunanidhi, said here today.
He came out with this clarification responding to a question at a
press meet whether there was any incongruity in the context of
his saying that he would be happy if the LTTE secured Eelam
through armed struggle or negotiations and the Centre making it
clear that it was not for Tamil Eelam.
Behind his expression was his anxiety that the present offensive
in the Island nation should end and lead to a solution through
negotiations. According recognition to Eelam or not was a
different matter. Despite all the developments that had taken
place, if the present war ended and a political solution was
arrived at he would be all the more happy, the Chief Minister
said.
Mr. Karunanidhi said his sentiment should not be taken to mean
that he would raise his voice on behalf of Tamil Nadu for the
creation of Tamil Eelam. What he meant was, whether it was a
question of Eelam or Tamils securing all rights there should be a
conducive atmosphere where Tamils could live in peace.
However, he made it clear that for achieving this objective he
would neither accept or welcome the presence of LTTE in Tamil
Nadu nor allow the Tigers to use Tamil Nadu as a base for their
activities. Even recently, he said, the police had prevented
certain activities of LTTE supporters in the State and that only
demonstrated the Government's firmness in this regard, the Chief
Minister said.
His attention was drawn to the Centre's contention that the ban
on LTTE had been extended because the Tamil Eelam demand might
whip up secessionist tendencies in Tamil Nadu also.
In response, Mr. Karunanidhi said in Tamil Nadu the secessionist
demand had gained strong momentum under the leadership of Periyar
and Anna. ``It is now long time since we have totally abandoned
such a demand''.
Since the start of the recent conflict in Sri Lanka, 114 Tamil
refugees had arrived in the State and the Police and the Coast
Guard were keeping vigil, he said answering a question on the
steps taken by the Government to prevent the entry of militants
in the guise of refugees.
Asked about the next stage of negotiations with Kerala on Mullai
Periyar dam issue, Mr. Karunanidhi said, he had planned to stay
in Delhi from May 19 to 22 to attend the meetings of Planning
Commission, Cauvery River Authority and Inter-State Council. The
Centre had also arranged talks also on the Mullai Periyar issue.
On the penalty of Rs. 28 crore imposed on Mr. T. T. V. Dinakaran,
AIADMK MP and nephew of Ms. Jayalalitha's friend Ms. Sasikala,
for contravention of various provisions of Foreign Exchange
Regulation Act, the Chief Minister said, action against Mr.
Dinakaran was initiated during the regime of former Prime
Minister, Mr. P. V. Narasimha Rao. The penalty was in respect of
the cases registered against him.
On the achievements of his regime in the last four years, Mr.
Karunanidhi said there was satisfaction to a great extent and he
was anxious to do more for the people. He was particularly happy
about the popularity of the schemes he had launched during the
period such as Samathuvapuram, farmers' market, comprehensive
free health check up for all, Anna Marumalarchi and self-help
programme.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Regional Previous : Patwa alleges underutilisation of funds by Rajasthan Next : 'LTTE not sole protectors of Tamils' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|