|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, May 14, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
No consensus on delimitation of constituencies
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, MAY 13. Consensus eluded an all-party meeting,
convened by the Union Government, on delimitation of
constituencies and rotation of constituencies reserved for
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
The meeting, convened by the Union Law and Justice Minister, Mr.
Ram Jethmalani, and attended by leaders of recognised national
and state parties, ended without any agreement on the modalities
of the delimitation of constituencies and rotation of reserved
constituencies.
The agenda note circulated by the Government sought views of
parties on (i) amendment of the Constitution to further extend
the embargo on undertaking fresh delimitation up to the year 2026
or until the figures of the census to be conducted thereafter
become available.
(ii) Delimitation of constituencies contained within a State,
without altering the number of seats in Legislatures presently
allotted, so as to remove the imbalances caused due to uneven
growth of population/electorate in different constituencies.
(iii) To allow rotation of reserved constituencies and
(iv) To entrust the job of delimitation along with all associated
issues to the Election Commission on a permanent basis.
There was unanimity among the party representatives on the need
to continue the freeze on fresh delimitation and delimitation of
constituencies without altering the number of seats in each
State/Union Territory, but the parties were divided on the manner
in which the task should be undertaken.
The leaders differed on the proposal to entrust the job to the
Election Commission. Parties like the Congress were of the view
that entrusting the job of delimitation to the Commission would
increase the load of an already overburdened Election Commission.
They were sharply divided on the subject at an all-party convened
by the Election Commission last month.
The Union Cabinet had already approved a proposal to further
amend the Constitution to continue the freeze on delimitation
from 2001 to 26.
Lifting the freeze on delimitation would benefit States like
Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, which were not a success story in
curbing population and hurt States like Kerala and Andhra Pradesh
as the number of seats of a State in the Lok Sabha were linked to
its population.
However, all parties were unanimous on the need to rationalise
the size of constituencies within a State/Union Territory in view
of serious distortions that have cropped in the last few decades.
The case of Delhi illustrates the point. While the size of Outer
Delhi constituency is over 20 lakh, the size of Chandini Chowk is
less than eight lakh.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Jaffna may not fall easily Next : Meet on child soldiers begins tomorrow | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|