|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, May 07, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Forms of transience
'I want my paintings to be thought-provoking, not pretty. In an
era of technology, the meaning of beauty is changing ... I see
beauty in a negative perspective,' says Amitabh Sengupta. ANJALI
SIRCAR profiles the artist.
ASENIOR painter from Calcutta, Amitabh Sengupta, returns to the
city with new paintings on display at "Artworld". These works
have overlapping images of his earlier series - "Interiors and
Exteriors", "Walls" and "Surface of Time". There is no specific
story, no specific man but quite a number of the canvases and
watercolours, which when seen together, point towards a theme -
human life. The symbols on the pictures never seem to leave the
level of man's sensate existence. Undefined forms, forms that
snarl in reality tell about the life of man in transience. Or
whatever the viewer's eye sees in them. He has not, therefore,
titled these works.
Sengupta has had a distinguished career in art. He took his
degree from the Government College of Arts and Crafts, Calcutta,
went to Ecole Nationale Superieure des Beaux in Paris on a French
Government scholarship and subsequently, went to study at the
State University of New York under a UNESCO Fellowship. Between
1977 and 1987, he worked as head of the faculty of visual arts in
two Nigerian universities and also studied at the State
University of Buffalo, U.S.. In his paintings one can see the
reflection of western sophistication that blends with strong,
indigenous impulses.
A cerebral painter who is not swayed by what he sees on the
surface, there is a deliberate attempt on his part at disturbing
the superficial identity of objects till he accepts absurdity as
real and surprise as an essential factor. He believes that
meaning is a happening caused by much deeper and more intense
actions begun in an infinite zone - beyond his control.
The artist wants to depict the inherent contradictions in today's
world. Terms such as globalisation and liberalisation are
creating various cultural identities like masks and we are
changing these masks at our convenience. The same man who is very
traditional, suddenly becomes modern. This is a reflection on
society.
Elaborating on this theme, he says: "In our life, which is
nothing great, no true change is happening. There are various
elements coming in the form of change but their rhythms and
purposes are not clear to many people. For example, you may find
people whose daily routine has not changed for 30 or 40 years -
in fact they have become poorer - but they see elegant houses
coming up, posh cars coming in and out and shops glittering with
glossy goods. This kind of urban life creates inherent
contradictions. The paintings I do now, while trying to define a
recognisable logical environment, come out with the most
illogical shapes which negate this environment and cry out, as
though, for a choreographer who will appear and tell them how to
bring about an order to their chaotic life. This expectation is a
kind of speculation - a hypothetical assumption."
He makes his point that the man who is waiting for any change to
happen, stands outside the power group which is playing its own
role in society. People who have the power are not waiting - they
are acting and changing things but their action does not touch
the life of the common man. The artist would not like to make an
ideological statement and hold anything against any class of
people. Society, as a whole, is responsible for this state of
affairs, and society is not an institution or a leader. It is a
totality, and the success or failure of man is part of this
totality.
Yet he will not put the stamp of finality on his opinion of
society and people. He does not believe that any such commentary
can be absolute. "As I have included my observations in my
paintings, I also believe that my audience will observe my work,
develop hypothetical views and create their own explanations. It
is quite legitimate for the audience to develop their own
meanings. Even if these are beyond my meaning, I would not mind
so because the main purpose of my painting is not sending out a
message but creating a pictorial record. My visual language and
forms have the liberty to get away from the exactness of my
opinion and enter some obscure or unknown areas".
As a painter he has discovered that the studio is a versatile,
meditative area where many ideas take shape. Some of them are
realistic, some of them do not exist in the room but elsewhere,
in the imagination and they do not explain themselves quite so
obviously. Known ideas and objects get mixed up with unknown
ideas and objects and pass on into the paintings, thereby
transforming apparent reality into a point of reference. It is
like a sojourn from canvas to canvas, from watercolours to
prints, tempera and mixed media.
He has stopped thinking that his works have to depend only on
exploring techniques. Styles and techniques are appropriate
vehicles for certain ideas - never to be conspicuous or imposing.
He searches for essential materials, straightforward and less
distracting from the flow of his work. He often deviates from the
academic style of three-dimensionality and switches over to the
two-dimensional flat space. The use of enamel paint over oils
heightens every original combination. Watercolours are derived
from the staining process - he does not begin painting with any
specific idea - and gradually the stains bring out forms which he
follows and develops, and a theme grows. In some of the
watercolours, nature is slowly enters as also human faces - at
the same time, various symbols such as funnels and telephones get
superimposed on them indicating that the stability of man is
being disturbed by a continuous invasion of ideas and information
received from his surroundings. His human beings are thereby
tortured, confused and angry.
"I want my paintings to be thought-provoking, not pretty. In the
new technological situation, the meaning of beauty is changing. I
do not need the exactness of the earlier harmony - I see beauty
in a negative perspective and it is important to create good art
in such a situation for this will give us a kind of strength to
understand and appreciate what is positive and powerful."
Born in 1941, Amitabh Sengupta has exhibited his paintings in all
reputed galleries in India and abroad. His works are held in
private and public collections.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Site after site Next : On her own terms | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|