|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, May 03, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Next
Williams is world champion
By Geet Sethi
SHEFFIELD, MAY 2. Exhibiting great application and resilience,
Mark Williams overcame a 6-12 deficit to overcome ninth seed
Mathew Stevens 18-16 in a dramatic finish to win the Embassy
World snooker championship. The victory worth œ240,000 came in
the early hours of Tuesday, after a prolonged and intriguing
battle of nerves.
Stevens, who had performed with such composure and focus
throughout the 17-day event, eventually succumbed to the
relentless pressure applied by his opponent. He took home
œ140,000 and the œ20,000 cheque for the high break prize for the
143 he compiled in the fourth frame of his semifinal victory over
Ireland's Joe Swail.
It was a roller-coaster ride for most of Williams' supporters. He
commenced the match somewhat subdued, showing signs of the
draining efforts of his semifinal contest where he clinched a 17-
15 victory over Higgins after trailing 10-14 at one stage.
Williams has the insolent, almost defiant, look of a boxer who is
sure of his own ability. Almost as if he knows he is keeping a
date with destiny. Stevens is more childlike, more innocent,
giving an impression of being unsure of whether he should be here
in the final stages of the most important event on the snooker
calendar.
As they walked down together for the concluding session to play
the most significant frames of their respective careers, one
could not but reflect at the contrasting manner in which they had
both reached the final of the millennium's first world
championship.
Stevens, after the early elimination of Stephen Hendry and Ronnie
O'Sullivan, was virtually confirmed of his place in the final.
His progress in the tournament justified the bookies' faith in
slashing his odds to 12-1 for the title, even before he had
potted a ball. He trounced Malta's Tony Drago 10-3, then
outclassed Scotland's Alan McManus 13-4, dashed the hopes of the
entire U.K. public by eliminating Jimmy White 13-7 before
cruising into the final with a comfortable 17-12 win over
compatriot Dominic Dale. Williams was in the potentially more
dangerous half with 1998 world champion John Higgins scheduled to
meet him in the semifinals. And even though he carved out
impressive 10-4, 13-9 and 13-5 victories over John Read, Drew
Hendry and Fergal O'Brien respectively, the draining effects of a
hard fought 17-15 victory over World No. 1 Higgins had depleted
his mental stamina and reserves.
Even so, as they commenced the final, the bookmakers' faith lay
with Williams. He had after all been the most consistent
campaigner this season, who had reached seven finals and
converted two into titles. He was also the undisputed World No. 1
in next year's world rankings. Stevens on the other hand had won
two non-ranking events - The Wembley and Regal Masters - but
despite reaching the final of the U.K. championship for the last
two successive years had yet to clinch a ranking title.
Though Stevens initiated a 3-1 advantage early in the first
session on Sunday afternoon, Williams, who defeated Stevens to
win the U.K. championship this season, rallied effectively to end
the session 4-4. The second session was emphatically dominated by
the 22-year-old Stevens, who recorded two centuries taking his
tally of three-figure breaks in the contest to three and in the
tournament to nine. Though the 10-6 advantage at the conclusion
of the second session was unexpected, what was surprising was the
total lack of application from Williams.
But the look of defiance combined with the insolence displayed on
the table embellishes Williams with a threatening, almost
menacing, quality, which in turn does instil an element of awe,
even fear in the opponent. Perhaps, this look and attitude were
cultivated during the years he indulged in amateur boxing. Or,
perhaps deep down, the 25-year-old - extremely affable off the
table - really believes that he is the best in the trade.
When he ended the third session, which commenced on Monday
afternoon, trailing only 11-13, he had begun what had looked like
a highly unlikely recovery. He had trailed 6-12 after Stevens
took the opening two frames with a 108, his fourth century of the
match.
But in winning five of the next six frames and, more importantly,
by resorting to audacious and adventurous shot selection, he
combined the dual task of giving his own sagging morale a boost
and sowing the first seeds of doubt in Stevens. There were only
two breaks of note, a 106 in the 19th frame and an 80 in the
21st, but the left-hander exhibited a variety of spectacular
individual pots enroute to his five-frame winning sequence.
He played with admirable conviction to level at 14-14 with
efforts of 77 and 67. For the first time since the two players
were tied at 4-4, Williams had levelled scores. Stevens responded
with alacrity. A flowing 120 confirming his mental fortitude and
his appetite for competition.
But that was the last big break from him. With the pressure
mounting, the quality of play plummeted and soon the numerous
unforced errors bore stark testimony to the fragile state of
their respective minds. Williams struck the ball too hard missing
by wide margins, while Stevens failed to find the baulk cushion
when playing safe.
It was Williams, however, who managed to control the frayed
nerves and clinch the match, winning the last two frames with
authority.
The results (final): Mark Williams beat Mathew Stevens 18-16
50-62, 28-84(77), 56-33, 23-103(103), 65-18, 76(57)-61, 123(123)-
0, 35-75(65), 24-64, 37-91(78), 21-59, 0-117(111), 7- 114(114),
79(59)-6, 22-73(73), 68(63)-0, 0-133(108), 48-66, 106(106)-0, 54-
55, 81(80)-0, 79-34, 71-46, 79-37, 77(77)-33, 0- 67(67), 75-6,
74(67)-0, 16-120(120), 61-13, 70-66(52), 29-60, 76(56)-8, 73-21.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Next : ICC looks determined to lead the game out of the mess | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|