|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, May 02, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Regional
| Previous
| Next
PCC(I) finds it tough to tackle issue
By Girish Menon
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, MAY 1. The Kerala Pradesh Congress(I)
Committee is finding it difficult to comply with the April 30
deadline for ending all local alliances not authorised by either
itself or the UDF.
In many districts, the alliances are of bizarre shapes, with
Congress(I) members breaking bread with either the BJP or the
CPI(M), to keep one of the UDF partners out of power. However,
the interesting aspect is that the charge of illegal alliance is
not just against the Congress(I), which has pointed out similar
instances of its partners like the IUML's association with the
opposite camp.
The April 30 deadline to sever all unauthorised alliances was
fixed by the UDF high-power committee at its meeting in the first
week of April. The KPCC(I) later endorsed it and even sent
circulars to its district and lower functionaries. The UDF was
forced to take such a decision when the IUML made some plain
statements regarding such alliances which were working against
its interests. The IUML all-India general secretary, Mr. E.
Ahmed, and later Mr. Korambayil Ahmed Haji categorically asked
the Congress(I) leadership to end such alliances.
The IUML listed out 11 panchayats in Malappuram district where
the Congress(I) had teamed up with the CPI(M) to keep the League
out of power. This, however, was disputed by the AICC(I) general
secretary, Mr. Ghulam Nabi Azad, who claimed that the dispute was
restricted to just four panchayats. He had explained that the
disputes here had cropped up even before the panchayat elections
in 1995 and the two parties went to the polls without firming up
the seat-sharing process. The illegal alliances are not
restricted to Malappuram alone. Recently, the KPCC(I) suspended
the president of Karadukka panchayat, Mr. Narayanan, from the
party for refusing to comply with the ultimatum. In Kannur and
Kasaragod districts, unauthorised alliances have been struck not
only in panchayats but in cooperative societies as well.
The fight is not confined to the IUML and the Congress(I) alone.
In several places in Kottayam, Pathanamthitta etc, the Kerala
Congress factions have been charged with pulling the rug from
under the feet of its partners and vice versa.
But the most difficult job facing the KPCC(I) is to make its
disciplinary action strict. In most of the panchayats, the
alliances are very loose and even party affiliation is very thin.
Thanks to the trend of fielding known personalities in the local
bodies poll, party loyalty was not one of the criteria which went
into the choice of candidates.
According to a KPCC(I) office-bearer, the most difficult part of
the ultimatum was to make the disciplinary proceedings strict. In
many cases, the Karadukka incident for example, the party has
been defied, and the alliances continue with impunity. In some
cases, like the Palakkad Municipality, the unauthorised alliance
was ended, but UDF leaders were finding it difficult to work out
a formula for sharing of various posts in the municipality.
The UDF is scheduled to meet on May 10 to review the progress
made so far. Before that, IUML leaders are expected to meet the
Congress(I) president, Ms. Sonia Gandhi, on May 6. And senior
IUML leaders would be in Delhi to attend a national meet of the
party.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Regional Previous : 47 p.c. growth in IT revenue Next : Antony flays delay in copra price announcement | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|