|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, April 29, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Regional
| Previous
| Next
Opposition parties walk out of Assembly
By Our Special Correspondent
CHENNAI, APRIL 28. Almost the entire Opposition today walked out
of the Tamil Nadu Assembly after the TMC clashed with the
Treasury Benches over the controversial, but now-revoked G.O.
pertaining to alleged sanction for constructing three hotels in
the hill-town of Kodaikanal in violation of the rules.
While the TMC MLA, Dr. Chellakumar, repeatedly alleged that a
``fundamental error'' of a serious nature had been `committed' by
the present DMK regime in the land-use reclassification, the
Government maintained that ``no offence has been committed.'' It
was a procedural lapse which had been promptly rectified by the
Chief Minister, Mr. M. Karunanidhi by cancelling the orders.
Participating in the discussions on the demands for grants for
Housing and Urban Development Department, Dr. Chellakumar asked
what action had been taken against the Minister concerned as,
without his knowledge, the G.O.s' could not have been issued in
the first place.
Recalling the ``Pleasant Stay Hotel'' case under the previous
AIADMK regime, Dr. Chellakumar said despite the grave
consequences that case has had for the former Chief Minister,
Ms.Jayalalitha and others in allowing a hotel to construct
additional floors in Kodaikanal though that land was already
earmarked for commercial use, in this case a ``mistake has been
committed knowingly.''
Refuting the TMC's contentions, the Housing Minister, Mr. K.
Pitchandi said what had been cleared was ``land use change'' and
not any `permission' for constructing three hotels there.
Mr. Pitchandi said a G.O. came into effect only after it was
notified and published in the Gazette. But even before that stage
was reached, when an official-level lapse was noticed, the G.O.s'
were revoked and no irregularity had taken place.
Even as the other vociferous TMC MLA, Mr. S. Alagiri, came to the
aid of Dr. Chellakumar's attack against the Government, the
Leader of the House, Mr. K. Anbazhagan, the Transport Minister,
Mr. K. Ponmudi and the Labour Minister, Mr. Rahman Khan backed up
Mr. Pitchandi's contentions on the issue.
The TMC members in an agitated mood kept revolving around the
Minister ``signing the G.O.''. Mr. Alagiri in particular wanted
to know whether the Government's policy prerogative to change
land-use classification preceded the passing of the G.O.s' or
after it.
Defending the Government's position, Mr. Anbazhagan said given
the multi-layered nature of State decision-making, the Chief
Minister, sensing that the official view in this instance was
``improper,'' had nipped a potential error in the bud.
The ``Pleasant Stay Hotel case'' was entirely different, wherein
the former Chief Minister had allegedly abetted a wrong-doing
despite an earlier High Court verdict pertaining to that case,
Mr. Anbazhagan said, adding, no offence was committed in the
present instance.
Mr. Ponmudi made the point that the Chief Minister was alert to
notice that if the G.O.s' on land-used change went unchecked, it
could thrown open the flood-gates to builders to make similar
demands in future and hence cancelled them. There was also a
`procedural flaw' as the two Secretaries concerned had not routed
their file through the Chief Secretary, he added.
Amid heated arguments from either side on the niceties of whether
a Government had the power or not to re-classify land use
particularly in a hill area, two contrary view points kept
emerging.
Even as the TMC asserted that any change which hit the eco-
balance of hill areas and its peaceful environs was not
permitted, Mr. Anbazhagan said Government had ``every right to
take any policy decision.''
Or else why have a Government, Mr. Anbazhagan asked and added
that the Chief Minister, at the same time, could overrule any
lower-level decision if proper procedures had not been followed.
With the Deputy Speaker, Mr. Paruthi Ilamvazhuthi, at one point
asking the Housing Minister to reply to the debate and Mr.
Chellakumar's plea on being allowed to complete his speech in
vain, the leader of the Opposition, Mr. S. Balakrishnan, led the
TMC MLAs' out in protest. Members of the AIADMK, CPI, CPI(M), INL
and FB followed suit.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Regional Previous : HC dismisses Jayalalitha plea in TV scam case Next : One-year RI for Muthiah's daughter | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|