|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, April 29, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Next
U.S.-Russia talks on ABM fail
By Vladimir Radyuhin
MOSCOW, APRIL 28. Russia is reviewing its options in case the
United States deploys a national anti-missile defence, the
Foreign Minister, Mr. Igor Ivanov, said upon completing his talks
in Washington.
``Russia cannot but get ready for this worst scenario in order to
guarantee its national security,'' the RIA Novosti news agency
quoted Mr. Ivanov as saying after his talks with the U.S.
Secretary of State, Ms. Madeleine Albright, failed to bridge the
sides' differences on the 1972 ABM Treaty.
If the U.S. decides to deploy a national missile defence system,
Moscow ``will not consider itself bound by the START-I, START-II
and all other disarmament pacts,'' Mr. Ivanov told RIA Novosti in
Washington. ``This will trigger uncontrollable processes and spur
on an arms race.''
The U.S. would like to modify the ABM Treaty to be able to deploy
what it calls a limited anti-ballistic missile defence consisting
of at least 100 interceptors in Alaska and a chain of early
warning radars to protect itself from nuclear missile attacks by
what it calls ``rogue'' states such as North Korea.
Russia's leaders, however, say deployment of such a defence
system would undermine the principle of mutually assured
destruction which has always been a cornerstone of deterrence
between the two nuclear superpowers.
Russian analysts say Moscow could agree to Washington's proposal
on two conditions. The U.S. Congress must ratify the 1977
protocol signed by the then Russian Foreign Minister, Mr. Yevgeny
Primakov, and Ms. Albright, which would ban the U.S. from
expanding a limited shield against ballistic missiles into a
national one, and the two countries go ahead for deeper cuts in
their nuclear arsenals to bring them down to 1,500 warheads,
compared to 3,500 allowed under START-II.
Mr. Ivanov and Ms. Albright agreed to continue their
consultations on ABM, but analysts are sceptical the U.S. would
accept Russian conditions.
``The U.S. will walk out of the ABM treaty,'' said Mr. Viktor
Kremenyuk, deputy director of the Institute of U.S. and Canada
Studies.
``Americans feel there is no point in making deals with Russia,
which is worthless as an ally and not fearful as an enemy.''
If the Russia-U.S. arms control system collapses, Russia will be
able to maintain an effective second-strike nuclear capability
for another 10 years, analysts said.
``Abrogation of START-II would allow Russia to deploy multiple
warheads on land-based missiles as well as stop scrapping
railway-mounted Topol ballistic missiles that will be difficult
for U.S. satellites to spot,'' said Mr. Ivan Safranchuk of the
Centre for Policy Studies.
``All in all, Russia can afford to keep 3,000 warheads operative,
which would be enough to overcome a U.S. national defence during
the next 10 years.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Next : Talks on Zimbabwe crisis come to nought | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|