|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, February 06, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Random Notes
Longest playing romance
MILLS & Boon is one of the most enduring success stories in world
publishing. The fluffy M & B romance, with its emotionally
"hyper" heroines and lachrymose plots, has survived the sexual
revolution, women's lib. and the general loss of innocence which
has made the modern Ms so much more demanding and difficult to
please than when Gerald Mills and Charles Boon set up shop nearly
70 years ago.
Yet, we are told, that when it comes to M & B, the liberated MTV
generation is as vulnerable to its charms as their grandmothers
were. In 1998, M & B novels sold more than 200 million copies,
and in Britain every four out of 10 women passed the "loyalty"
test. What is interesting is the profile of a typical M & B
loyalist who is not, as is commonly believed, unambitious, bored
and working class. On the contrary, she is urbane, on-the-make
and "sophisticated", according to a survey quoted in the Times
Literary Supplement.
The Indian Miss is very much a member of the M & B fan club and
apparently teenaged adolescents are not the only ones who are
queueing up for the latest title. Some of the original "sinners"
though complain that M & B titles are no longer as innocent as
they used to be, and that more than a hint of naughtiness is
beginning to creep in - presumably a response to the changing
times.
In a sense, M & B was the first brand name in literature. Its
novels came off the assembly line "run" by little known and
underpaid writers, some of whom wrote nearly half a dozen novels
a year for years together according to a politically correct
formula that frowned upon pre-marital and extra-marital sex and
politics . "Superstars aren't grateful," Alan Boon is quoted as
saying in Passion's Fortune: The Story Of Mills & Boon (Oxford
University Press), a book just out on the M & B phenomenon.
The book, by Joseph MacAleer known for his studies on Britain's
cultural history, traces the origins of the M & B story to 1908
when Gerald Mills and Charles Boon left Methuen to start on their
own though it was not until the 1930s that the M & B brand came
on its own. The decision to have a safe formula which would
appeal to readers across geographical boundaries - no
controversies, no overt sex and happy endings - was prompted by
the company's uncertain future; and it worked. And, more than
half a century later, is still working.
* * *
Fluff and more fluff
ACOMMISSIONING editor of a multinational publishing house, which
has come out with a new line of titles for the Indian market,
confesses that she is not terribly interested in "very serious
stuff" because there is no demand for it. She only confirms the
distressing reality that fluff sells and therefore fluff is what
is being produced, particularly by the more commercial-minded
publishing houses.
So, we have superficial biographies of celebrities, particularly
film stars; quickies on major news events (Kargil, the nuclear
debate, and Indo-Pakistan relations, with each claiming to be
more authoritative than others); cookery books; coffee table
volumes on travel, wildlife and that old chestnut, the
"maharajas" and their "maharanis". One Delhi publisher used to
specialise in first novels by women, until he ran out of them and
has now settled down to a less heady routine.
On the face of it, the argument that publishers produce what
people demand makes a lot of sense - a classic case of demand and
supply - but didn't the commercial Hindi film-makers use the same
argument for years and made bad cinematic taste a national
pastime until the parallel cinema arrived and showed that there
was another side to the story? The parallel cinema itself may not
have been a huge success - in fact much of it flopped - but it
did have a trickle-down effect and apart from creating an
enormously successful "middle" cinema it raised the level of
expectations for even commercial films. The formula does not sell
easily anymore.
Hopefully, "formula" publishing too will find its level, but
until then there is no escape from dubious quickies and hyped-up
biographies, not to mention the cookery books and hardy
"maharajas".
* * *
Old ghosts again
RETURNING to the Delhi international film festival after many
years, one was struck by how much it has NOT changed. The debate
on art and commercial cinema, which one thought had long been
settled, continued to rage with everyone repeating familiar
lines. Om Puri though tied himself in knots while trying to
ingratiate himself with his new patrons and, in the process,
disowning the cinema which first gave him a place in the sun. But
that is what class-climbing is all about; you discard the ladder
when you reach the top.
Other ghosts from the past which haunted the festival included
chaotic screening schedules (the best films shown at the worst of
times and in the smallest of theatres); grumbling film-makers and
critics; "sarkari" hangers-on; and a scramble for popular Hindi
films. And then, of course, there was that festival "constant",
Derek Malcolm of The Guardian with his very cautious and
diplomatic reaction to the goings-on. Some things, and some
people, never change.
* * *
Orwell-ian puzzle
THE theory that the title of George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty Four
was nothing but a play on 1948, the year closest to its
publication, has taken a knock with the discovery that it could
have been actually influenced by his first wife Eileen
O'Shaughnessy's poem "End Of The Century, 1984", which she wrote
in 1934.
Why he chose Nineteen Eighty Four as the title however remains a
mystery and as Sally Coniam, writing in TLS (December 31, 1999)
wonders:"We know exactly why Eileen O'Shaughnessy chose '1984' as
part of the title for her 1934 poem but it is less obvious why
Orwell should have chosen it for the title of his novel. There
are several theories - such as the reversal of numbers in 1948 or
the influence of Jack London's novels, especially The Iron Heel.
Orwell told his publisher F. J. Warburg, in a letter in 1948,
that he first had the idea for Nineteen Eighty Four in 1943 (two
years before Eileen's death) but surely nothing before has so
directly suggested the influence of his clever first wife as this
poem."
Another case of a woman lurking behind a man's secret.
Recommended: Granta (68), distributed by Penguin, on aspects of
love, its ecstasies and pain.
Those with an eye on tomorrow might like to browse through
Scanning The Future: Twenty Eminent Thinkers On The World Of
Tomorrow, edited by Yorick Blumenfeld (Thames and Hudson).
Blumenfeld has picked up extracts from works of 20 leading
academics and professionals to give a kaleidoscopic view of
the future; and those who claim to have "seen" the future include
economists, historians, sociologists and scientists. Francis
Fukuyama of the End Of History fame and Nelson Mandela are among
the marquee names.
HASAN SUROOR
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : The shades of silence Next : Politics, language and truth | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|