|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, February 06, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Partners in progress
The debate over reservation for women in Parliament has gone on
long enough. Isn't it time we woke up to the fact that democracy
keeps women on the sidelines? Until equality between men and
women on a social and political level is ensured, no true
democracy is possible in India, says V. MOHINI GIRI, calling for
a change in the mind-set of our patriarchal society.
THERE have been many debates about the need for reservation of
women in Parliament. A nation is a living, pulsating entity -
changing and developing new aspirations and facing new
challenges. A visionary Parliament, as our founding fathers hoped
it would be, will constantly evolve, devolve and evolve again,
new combinations and permutations keeping the changing economic,
social, legal and political factors in view. The socio economic
framework is changing rapidly to bring women into the job market.
Either as a housewife or as a professional, she contributes
towards nation building. And then the lawmakers of the nation
turn around and say: we can reserve seats for the backward, the
deprived, the marginalised. But you, despite being violated
against, despite the sexual, psychological and physical assault
on you, despite economic dependence and deprivation, despite a
heavily patriarchal legal code, despite a plethora of social
traditions meant to suppress you... you are not marginalised
enough, not discriminated against enough, not deprived enough,
not weak enough to merit reservation in Parliament.
The demand for reservation is not new to our country. In 1920,
Sarojini Naidu and Margaret Cousins had led a small delegation of
women demanding rights of representation. This was at a time when
women in most western countries had no right to vote. Later in
1931, the Karachi session of the Indian National Congress had
committed itself to political equality of women regardless of
their status and qualifications in response to women
organisation's memorandum demanding total adult franchise.
Formerly, women's participation in politics or their presence in
this field was not considered essential. We know that there are
two major methods of political participation, one as voter, and
the other as elective office for representation in legislature
and government. The presence of women is visibly lacking. Despite
persistent efforts, women continue to be marginalised due to the
patriarchal mindset of the society.
A major hurdle is getting women into politics. It is not just a
matter of finding women willing to stand for election but getting
women to show that first vital interest in participation, which
is registering to vote. Around the country, women are being
mobilised by the women's movement and local women politicians to
take more interest in politics.
The campaign for women's reservation in the Lok Sabha and the
Legislative Assemblies had been now going on for the past four
years. This initiative is to establish political equality which
is guaranteed in our Constitution. The campaign that has been
carried on by the NCW and the women's movement has created public
interest from grassroots onwards, in asserting the rights of
women. The campaign without question signifies the social and
political space created by women's movement and the NCW in India
for building up an effective initiative for the rights of women.
We have been striving hard to pave the networking and alliance of
different groups of women activists all over the country trying
to evolve the identity of women as one political constituency in
India.
The Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha on September 13, 1996.
The Bill that should have been passed on the same day is still a
far cry from reality. All political parties had reached a
consensus that 33 per cent reservation for women should be made
in the Legislature. The highlights of the bill are:
There should not be less than one third seats reserved for women
in the Lok Sabha and Legislative Assemblies.
The reservations are for an indefinite period.
The reserved constituencies are to be determined through a draw
of lots because for SCs and STs, constituencies are reserved on
the basis of the proportion of the population. Constituencies
with a high SC/ST population are supposed to be delimited after
some years. Since the population of women is unevenly spread
throughout the country, this formula cannot be applied. The draw
of lots system means every time a new set of constituencies will
be declared as reserved for women.
There is also a provision of parallel reservations for SCs and
STs, which is to say, women belonging to SCs and STs will be
getting one third of seats reserved for people of that category,
that is quota within a quota.
The Bill leaves out of its purview reservations in the Rajya
Sabha and the Legislative Council.
The denial of rightful share of political power to women who
constitute half the total population is a global phenomenon.
Today the world is watching us if we would be able to take this
historical step towards equality. In a polity where money,
feudalism and muscle power dominate, women's political
participation is not merely difficult because of the patriarchal
structure of the parties, but also virtually impossible. We have
noticed that women were denied their rightful share in power by a
virtual monopoly of party tickets by men.
Most of the women MPs confided to me that they continued to be
elected because, they say they are known for their good track
recordTo be elected, a women needs to join a political party. The
potential candidate must go through a selection process by
applying to and being endorsed by the party, then campaigning,
usually with the other endorsed candidates, to convince the
electorate of her credibility and ability.
Several women's organisations have shown that solidarity among
women can fight even powerful vested interests and today, if all
of us come together we will be able not only to give good
governance but also to set up good parliamentary democracy.
I also feel that women have a special place in politics and that
"we are better organisers and leaders. Men sometimes overlook
issues that women can see clearly. We can dig in our heels and
give the men something to think about."
I have explored the possibility of women groups identifying
potential women candidates to be fielded. When we ask women about
fielding women, we are told "We are getting the support of the
ladies in the town". "I don't think we will have a problem
reaching our target if we field the candidates." "Things are
changing and now women are aware of their rights. They can vote
for who they like and don't have to be bullied by their husbands
into voting for candidates of their choice and how they can also
be prospective candidates themselves."
Women known as social workers made good candidates: "They are
accessible - so that the electorate, particularly women, can air
their problems," they said. "Aspiring candidates should stay in
their own area, where they are known, and look for an issue they
can speak on such as drinking water, environment, health and
schooling."
Even at the grassroots level everyone is in favour of the smooth
passage of this bill. Hence, opposition to this bill, if any, is
not from anyone except the male politician who is reluctant to
give one third of the seats of power.
Contrary to what has often been said, democracy in India
marginalises women. No real democracy is possible in India if the
question of equality between women and men is not regarded as one
of the constitutive elements of the political system. The
strategy for parity should consist of measures which will ensure
full participation of women at all levels and in all aspects of
the functioning of a democratic society, on an equal footing with
men.
Parity is, in the end, the best way to guarantee that women have
the right to defend their own interests, as it is clear that,
until now, men have not wanted or not been able to defend the
interests of their whole electorate, especially the interests of
women. They have not been capable of ensuring the observance of
equality of rights and opportunities for all. The injustice lies
also with men, thanks to their over-representation, have been
able to put forward the diverse interests that different groups
of men have, whereas women, whose interests are just as diverse
as those of men, have not been able to do so. Because of their
very small number in political and public life, those women
elected are always expected to defend "Women's interests", as if
women were a homogenous group or an interest group, having only
common interests.
In the prevailing social context, women have been confined to a
private sphere as if they were the only ones entrusted with the
reproduction and care of the human species, and all the social
structures have functioned in relation to the masculine norm. If
democracy is considered as having to integrate all social forces,
it is obvious that such a relegation can no longer be tolerated
in a democratic society; whatever the structure of that society,
a new perspective and mind-set needs to be introduced in society.
Who says that tokenism is not the order of the day. Men, women,
all have the temptation to play to the gallery. When we talk
about reservation, men look surprised and say - wasn't Indira
Gandhi the Prime Minister of the country? Worse, they quote the
South Asian countries being headed by women presidents and Prime
Ministers. Then they quote several hundred laws favouring women.
Isn't the President of India a member of the lower caste, they
say. One could go on like this, but the problem of tokenism
cannot be solved. Heated discussions ensued in the Parliament on
December 23, 1999, and the Lok Sabha was thrown into a turmoil on
the question of the reservation bill.
Thanks to the ingenuity of the Union Law Minister, Mr. Ram
Jethmalani, that the Government was able to introduce the bill
after having failed three times before, first in 1996, then in
1997 and last in 1998. Amid pandemonium, the speaker Mr. Balayogi
asked for voice vote, which though inaudible, was announced
loudly. The Samaj Party leader Mr. Mulayam Singh Yadav refused to
accept the verdict and Mr. Vajpayee was heard saying that he had
never in his 40 years as a parliamentarian witnessed such an
incident in the Lok Sabha. The bill seeks to reserve one-third
seats to the Lok Sabha, the legislative Assemblies of the states
and the National Capital Territory of Delhi for a period of 15
years.
Swami Vivekananda once stated "No nation can be great if half of
its population is degraded and discriminated against. Women
constitute half of India's teeming billion. Political
participation is a vital link towards total empowerment of women.
With that empowerment she, as many of my brothers seem to fear,
is not a threat to men but a partner in progress - the effective
participant - the true Bhagidhari.
The author is former Chairperson of the National Commission for
Women.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Conversion: the real issue Next : Plots that crackle along | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|